DYLG vs. SPIN
DYLG (Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF) and SPIN (State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. DYLG is passively managed, while SPIN is actively managed. Over the past year, DYLG returned 17.86% vs 19.71% for SPIN. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DYLG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SPIN.
Performance
DYLG vs. SPIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DYLG achieves a 4.63% return, which is significantly higher than SPIN's 2.91% return.
DYLG
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 3.69%
- YTD
- 4.63%
- 6M
- 5.52%
- 1Y
- 17.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPIN
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- YTD
- 2.91%
- 6M
- 3.47%
- 1Y
- 19.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DYLG vs. SPIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DYLG Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF | 4.63% | 12.50% | 5.41% |
SPIN State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF | 2.91% | 14.14% | 6.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between DYLG and SPIN is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024 | 0.79 |
The correlation between DYLG and SPIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
DYLG vs. SPIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DYLG
SPIN
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
DYLG
SPIN
Industrials
DYLG
SPIN
Technology
DYLG
SPIN
Healthcare
DYLG
SPIN
Consumer Cyclical
DYLG
SPIN
Consumer Defensive
DYLG
SPIN
Basic Materials
DYLG
SPIN
Energy
DYLG
SPIN
Communication Services
DYLG
SPIN
Real Estate
DYLG
-
SPIN
Utilities
DYLG
-
SPIN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DYLG vs. SPIN — Risk / Return Rank
DYLG
SPIN
DYLG vs. SPIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF (DYLG) and State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DYLG | SPIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.36 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 2.02 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.78 | 8.42 | +0.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DYLG | SPIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 1.89 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.95 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
DYLG vs. SPIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DYLG drawdown since its inception was -13.98%, smaller than the maximum SPIN drawdown of -16.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYLG and SPIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DYLG | SPIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.98% | -16.85% | +2.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.31% | -9.81% | +1.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -0.40% | -0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.86% | -2.29% | +0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 2.35% | -0.31% |
Volatility
DYLG vs. SPIN - Volatility Comparison
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF (DYLG) has a higher volatility of 2.46% compared to State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN) at 1.82%. This indicates that DYLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DYLG | SPIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.46% | 1.82% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.46% | 8.03% | -0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.44% | 10.49% | -1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.44% | 14.33% | -2.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.44% | 14.33% | -2.89% |
DYLG vs. SPIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
DYLG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPIN's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
DYLG vs. SPIN - Dividend Comparison
DYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.54%, more than SPIN's 5.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DYLG Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF | 9.54% | 9.63% | 16.55% | 1.38% |
SPIN State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF | 5.64% | 8.20% | 2.36% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DYLG and SPIN have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DYLG has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to SPIN (1.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DYLG dropped -13.98% vs SPIN's -16.85%.
On 1-year performance, SPIN leads with 19.71% vs 17.86% for DYLG. On fees, SPIN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SPIN has been the lower-risk option at 1.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPIN has performed better with a 19.71% return vs 17.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPIN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for DYLG.
DYLG has the higher dividend yield at 9.54%, compared with 5.64% for SPIN.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for DYLG and 0.25% for SPIN.
DYLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DYLG and SPIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer