DYLG vs. GOOY
DYLG (Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF) and GOOY (YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. DYLG is passively managed, while GOOY is actively managed. Over the past year, DYLG returned 17.86% vs 88.26% for GOOY. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DYLG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for GOOY.
Performance
DYLG vs. GOOY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DYLG achieves a 4.63% return, which is significantly lower than GOOY's 13.61% return.
DYLG
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 3.69%
- YTD
- 4.63%
- 6M
- 5.52%
- 1Y
- 17.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOOY
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -5.16%
- YTD
- 13.61%
- 6M
- 11.36%
- 1Y
- 88.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DYLG vs. GOOY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DYLG Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF | 4.63% | 12.50% | 14.46% | 4.00% |
GOOY YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF | 13.61% | 53.95% | 12.58% | -3.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between DYLG and GOOY is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2023 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DYLG vs. GOOY — Risk / Return Rank
DYLG
GOOY
DYLG vs. GOOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF (DYLG) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DYLG | GOOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.65 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 5.50 | -3.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.78 | 21.08 | -12.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DYLG | GOOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 3.84 | -1.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 1.09 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
DYLG vs. GOOY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DYLG drawdown since its inception was -13.98%, smaller than the maximum GOOY drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYLG and GOOY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DYLG | GOOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.98% | -24.40% | +10.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.31% | -16.15% | +7.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -8.61% | +7.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.86% | -6.26% | +4.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 4.20% | -2.16% |
Volatility
DYLG vs. GOOY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF (DYLG) is 2.46%, while YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) has a volatility of 6.90%. This indicates that DYLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DYLG | GOOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.46% | 6.90% | -4.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.46% | 17.19% | -9.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.44% | 23.19% | -13.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.44% | 23.31% | -11.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.44% | 23.31% | -11.87% |
DYLG vs. GOOY - Expense Ratio Comparison
DYLG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GOOY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
DYLG vs. GOOY - Dividend Comparison
DYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.54%, less than GOOY's 50.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DYLG Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF | 9.54% | 9.63% | 16.55% | 1.38% |
GOOY YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF | 50.99% | 41.50% | 36.74% | 7.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DYLG and GOOY have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOOY has higher volatility (6.90%) compared to DYLG (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DYLG dropped -13.98% vs GOOY's -24.40%.
On 1-year performance, GOOY leads with 88.26% vs 17.86% for DYLG. On fees, DYLG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DYLG has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GOOY has performed better with a 88.26% return vs 17.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DYLG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GOOY.
GOOY has the higher dividend yield at 50.99%, compared with 9.54% for DYLG.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for DYLG and 0.99% for GOOY.
GOOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.84 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DYLG and GOOY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer