DYFI vs. PSDM
DYFI (IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF) and PSDM (PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DYFI returned 3.92% vs 5.16% for PSDM. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DYFI charges 1.33%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for PSDM.
Performance
DYFI vs. PSDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DYFI achieves a -0.13% return, which is significantly lower than PSDM's 1.23% return.
DYFI
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 0.18%
- 1Y
- 3.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSDM
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 1.61%
- 1Y
- 5.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DYFI vs. PSDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DYFI IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF | -0.13% | 3.76% | -1.37% |
PSDM PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF | 1.23% | 6.16% | 5.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between DYFI and PSDM is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.58 |
The correlation between DYFI and PSDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.76 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DYFI vs. PSDM — Risk / Return Rank
DYFI
PSDM
DYFI vs. PSDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (DYFI) and PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF (PSDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DYFI | PSDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.64 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 4.35 | -2.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.52 | 19.69 | -14.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DYFI | PSDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | 2.96 | -1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 2.97 | -2.70 |
Drawdowns
DYFI vs. PSDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DYFI drawdown since its inception was -4.54%, which is greater than PSDM's maximum drawdown of -1.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYFI and PSDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DYFI | PSDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.54% | -1.19% | -3.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.49% | -1.19% | -1.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.07% | -0.16% | -0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.41% | -0.17% | -1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.71% | 0.26% | +0.45% |
Volatility
DYFI vs. PSDM - Volatility Comparison
IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (DYFI) has a higher volatility of 0.87% compared to PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF (PSDM) at 0.53%. This indicates that DYFI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DYFI | PSDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.87% | 0.53% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.01% | 1.28% | +0.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48% | 1.75% | +0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.38% | 2.01% | +1.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.38% | 2.01% | +1.37% |
DYFI vs. PSDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DYFI has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than PSDM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
DYFI vs. PSDM - Dividend Comparison
DYFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, less than PSDM's 4.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DYFI IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF | 4.62% | 4.63% | 5.93% | 0.00% |
PSDM PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF | 4.85% | 4.57% | 5.17% | 2.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DYFI and PSDM have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DYFI has higher volatility (0.87%) compared to PSDM (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DYFI dropped -4.54% vs PSDM's -1.19%.
On 1-year performance, PSDM leads with 5.16% vs 3.92% for DYFI. On fees, PSDM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, PSDM has been the lower-risk option at 0.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PSDM has performed better with a 5.16% return vs 3.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSDM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for DYFI.
PSDM has the higher dividend yield at 4.85%, compared with 4.62% for DYFI.
They also come from different issuers: IDX and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 1.33% for DYFI and 0.40% for PSDM.
PSDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DYFI and PSDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer