PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DY vs. MRVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DY vs. MRVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DY achieves a 35.80% return, which is significantly lower than MRVL's 240.32% return. Over the past 10 years, DY has underperformed MRVL with an annualized return of 18.40%, while MRVL has yielded a comparatively higher 41.26% annualized return.


DY

1D
-1.59%
1M
7.13%
YTD
35.80%
6M
31.51%
1Y
88.82%
3Y*
61.44%
5Y*
41.13%
10Y*
18.40%

MRVL

1D
9.63%
1M
69.78%
YTD
240.32%
6M
214.35%
1Y
323.75%
3Y*
69.41%
5Y*
42.37%
10Y*
41.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DY vs. MRVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DY
Dycom Industries, Inc.
35.80%94.13%51.24%22.96%-0.17%24.15%60.17%-12.75%-51.50%38.78%
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
240.32%-22.82%83.79%63.68%-57.48%84.62%80.25%65.74%-23.62%56.89%

Correlation

The correlation between DY and MRVL is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2000

0.36

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DY:

$13.94B

MRVL:

$258.03B

EPS

DY:

$10.52

MRVL:

$2.90

PE Ratio

DY:

43.60

MRVL:

99.74

PEG Ratio

DY:

0.61

MRVL:

0.18

PS Ratio

DY:

2.17

MRVL:

28.91

PB Ratio

DY:

7.35

MRVL:

14.17

Total Revenue (TTM)

DY:

$6.25B

MRVL:

$8.72B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DY:

$1.23B

MRVL:

$4.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

DY:

$1.07B

MRVL:

$4.27B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DY vs. MRVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DY
DY Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DY Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
DY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

MRVL
MRVL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
MRVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRVL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MRVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRVL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DY vs. MRVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DYMRVLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.59

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

12.37

-8.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.35

28.64

-16.29

DY vs. MRVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DY Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is lower than the MRVL Sharpe Ratio of 4.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DY and MRVL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DYMRVLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

4.70

-2.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

0.69

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.80

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.23

+0.01

Drawdowns

DY vs. MRVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DY drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, roughly equal to the maximum MRVL drawdown of -91.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DY and MRVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DYMRVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.54%

-91.60%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.43%

-26.36%

+1.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.58%

-60.79%

+28.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.70%

-61.88%

+28.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.01%

-61.88%

-27.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.26%

-8.72%

-5.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.66%

-46.77%

+1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.24%

11.37%

-4.13%

Volatility

DY vs. MRVL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY) is 25.89%, while Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) has a volatility of 38.50%. This indicates that DY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DYMRVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.89%

38.50%

-12.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.22%

54.32%

-16.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.58%

69.56%

-23.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.52%

61.51%

-17.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.95%

51.77%

+1.18%

Dividends

DY vs. MRVL - Dividend Comparison

DY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MRVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DY
Dycom Industries, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
0.08%0.28%0.22%0.40%0.65%0.21%0.50%0.90%1.48%1.12%1.73%2.72%

Financials

DY vs. MRVL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dycom Industries, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
1.96B
2.42B
(DY) Total Revenue
(MRVL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DY vs. MRVL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Dycom Industries, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
14.0%
52.2%
Portfolio components
DY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dycom Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 275.08M and revenue of 1.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.0%.

MRVL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 2.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.

DY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dycom Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 143.75M and revenue of 1.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.

MRVL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 339.40M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.

DY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dycom Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 91.29M and revenue of 1.96B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.

MRVL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 34.50M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DY and MRVL have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRVL has higher volatility (38.50%) compared to DY (25.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DY dropped -93.54% vs MRVL's -91.60%.

MRVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.70 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DY and MRVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer