DXW.TO vs. FLVI.NEO
DXW.TO (Dynamic Active International Dividend ETF) and FLVI.NEO (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both International Equity funds. DXW.TO is actively managed, while FLVI.NEO is passively managed. Over the past year, DXW.TO returned 18.54% vs 27.01% for FLVI.NEO. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DXW.TO vs. FLVI.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXW.TO achieves a 10.24% return, which is significantly lower than FLVI.NEO's 13.01% return.
DXW.TO
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 2.39%
- 6M
- 6.33%
- YTD
- 10.24%
- 1Y
- 18.54%
- 3Y*
- 12.00%
- 5Y*
- 4.87%
- 10Y*
- —
FLVI.NEO
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 9.35%
- YTD
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 27.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DXW.TO vs. FLVI.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DXW.TO Dynamic Active International Dividend ETF | 10.24% | 20.35% | -0.76% |
FLVI.NEO Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 13.01% | 33.34% | 9.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXW.TO and FLVI.NEO is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2024 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXW.TO vs. FLVI.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
DXW.TO
FLVI.NEO
DXW.TO vs. FLVI.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynamic Active International Dividend ETF (DXW.TO) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (FLVI.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DXW.TO | FLVI.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.51 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 3.53 | -1.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.16 | 13.23 | -7.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DXW.TO vs. FLVI.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXW.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.99%, which is greater than FLVI.NEO's maximum drawdown of -11.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXW.TO and FLVI.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXW.TO | FLVI.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.99% | -11.90% | -19.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.23% | -7.71% | -2.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | 0.00% | -1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.52% | -1.54% | -5.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 2.05% | +0.97% |
Volatility
DXW.TO vs. FLVI.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Dynamic Active International Dividend ETF (DXW.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.79% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (FLVI.NEO) at 2.11%. This indicates that DXW.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLVI.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXW.TO | FLVI.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.79% | 2.11% | +1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.09% | 7.98% | +4.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.39% | 10.06% | +4.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.41% | 12.67% | +1.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.82% | 12.67% | +4.15% |
Dividends
DXW.TO vs. FLVI.NEO - Dividend Comparison
DXW.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than FLVI.NEO's 2.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXW.TO Dynamic Active International Dividend ETF | 1.58% | 2.38% | 2.21% | 1.94% | 2.36% | 1.35% | 0.97% |
FLVI.NEO Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 2.76% | 3.07% | 3.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DXW.TO and FLVI.NEO have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Dynamic and Franklin Templeton.
Find the right allocation for DXW.TO and FLVI.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer