PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DXT.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DXT.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Dexterra Group Inc. (DXT.TO) and Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXT.TO achieves a 12.80% return, which is significantly lower than GRT-UN.TO's 19.72% return. Over the past 10 years, DXT.TO has underperformed GRT-UN.TO with an annualized return of 7.72%, while GRT-UN.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.48% annualized return.


DXT.TO

1D
1.48%
1M
3.66%
YTD
12.80%
6M
10.53%
1Y
51.53%
3Y*
39.21%
5Y*
22.12%
10Y*
7.72%

GRT-UN.TO

1D
0.22%
1M
3.25%
YTD
19.72%
6M
28.31%
1Y
41.14%
3Y*
9.94%
5Y*
7.55%
10Y*
14.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXT.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DXT.TO
Dexterra Group Inc.
12.80%55.32%43.20%11.05%-31.72%38.36%8.40%-30.88%17.73%-20.59%
GRT-UN.TO
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust
19.72%22.80%-4.30%15.18%-31.88%40.16%22.56%29.65%14.45%15.87%

Correlation

The correlation between DXT.TO and GRT-UN.TO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2006

0.10

The correlation between DXT.TO and GRT-UN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DXT.TO:

CA$829.70M

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$5.83B

EPS

DXT.TO:

CA$0.72

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$6.39

PE Ratio

DXT.TO:

18.08

GRT-UN.TO:

15.07

PEG Ratio

DXT.TO:

0.11

GRT-UN.TO:

0.93

PS Ratio

DXT.TO:

0.76

GRT-UN.TO:

9.32

PB Ratio

DXT.TO:

2.85

GRT-UN.TO:

1.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

DXT.TO:

CA$1.08B

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$629.87M

Gross Profit (TTM)

DXT.TO:

CA$161.12M

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$517.51M

EBITDA (TTM)

DXT.TO:

CA$113.74M

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$513.85M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DXT.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXT.TO
DXT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DXT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DXT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

GRT-UN.TO
GRT-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
GRT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXT.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dexterra Group Inc. (DXT.TO) and Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DXT.TOGRT-UN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.37

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

3.20

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.01

10.28

-1.28

DXT.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the GRT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXT.TO and GRT-UN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DXT.TOGRT-UN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

2.15

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.35

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

0.65

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.33

-0.33

Drawdowns

DXT.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXT.TO drawdown since its inception was -97.14%, which is greater than GRT-UN.TO's maximum drawdown of -87.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXT.TO and GRT-UN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DXT.TOGRT-UN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.14%

-87.48%

-9.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.84%

-12.91%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.91%

-27.99%

+14.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.49%

-37.82%

-6.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.68%

-44.89%

-46.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.28%

-0.77%

-61.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.33%

-16.98%

-42.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.74%

4.01%

+1.73%

Volatility

DXT.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Dexterra Group Inc. (DXT.TO) and Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO) have volatilities of 5.90% and 5.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DXT.TOGRT-UN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.90%

5.88%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.82%

14.87%

+3.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.18%

19.25%

+5.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.74%

21.88%

+5.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.84%

22.44%

+21.40%

Dividends

DXT.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison

DXT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, less than GRT-UN.TO's 3.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DXT.TO
Dexterra Group Inc.
2.98%3.22%4.49%6.08%6.35%3.78%2.31%1.30%0.89%1.04%0.82%2.48%
GRT-UN.TO
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust
3.61%4.18%4.74%4.21%4.50%2.86%3.43%4.25%5.69%5.31%5.42%1.62%

Financials

DXT.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dexterra Group Inc. and Granite Real Estate Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M20222023202420252026
275.47M
165.83M
(DXT.TO) Total Revenue
(GRT-UN.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

DXT.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Dexterra Group Inc. and Granite Real Estate Investment Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
14.0%
81.0%
Portfolio components
DXT.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dexterra Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 38.52M and revenue of 275.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.0%.

GRT-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 134.27M and revenue of 165.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.0%.

DXT.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dexterra Group Inc. reported an operating income of 15.71M and revenue of 275.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.7%.

GRT-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 122.29M and revenue of 165.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 73.7%.

DXT.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dexterra Group Inc. reported a net income of 13.52M and revenue of 275.47M, resulting in a net margin of 4.9%.

GRT-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of 91.25M and revenue of 165.83M, resulting in a net margin of 55.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DXT.TO and GRT-UN.TO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DXT.TO and GRT-UN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer