PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DXSL.DE vs. WELH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DXSL.DE vs. WELH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSL.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Industrials ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXSL.DE achieves a 8.84% return, which is significantly lower than WELH.DE's 15.64% return.


DXSL.DE

1D
0.45%
1M
-0.31%
YTD
8.84%
6M
10.88%
1Y
14.61%
3Y*
14.15%
5Y*
9.06%
10Y*
11.00%

WELH.DE

1D
0.12%
1M
2.21%
YTD
15.64%
6M
15.67%
1Y
24.04%
3Y*
17.39%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXSL.DE vs. WELH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DXSL.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
8.84%15.36%9.82%24.09%12.42%
WELH.DE
Amundi S&P Global Industrials ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc
15.64%9.85%16.48%19.96%7.75%

Correlation

The correlation between DXSL.DE and WELH.DE is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022

0.82

The correlation between DXSL.DE and WELH.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DXSL.DE vs. WELH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXSL.DE
DXSL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
DXSL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXSL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXSL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
DXSL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXSL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

WELH.DE
WELH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
WELH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WELH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
WELH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
WELH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
WELH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXSL.DE vs. WELH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSL.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Industrials ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DXSL.DEWELH.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.29

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

2.43

-1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.89

8.98

-5.09

DXSL.DE vs. WELH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXSL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the WELH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXSL.DE and WELH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DXSL.DEWELH.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

1.60

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

1.26

-0.89

Drawdowns

DXSL.DE vs. WELH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXSL.DE drawdown since its inception was -58.54%, which is greater than WELH.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXSL.DE and WELH.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DXSL.DEWELH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.54%

-20.70%

-37.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.21%

-9.84%

-3.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.06%

-20.70%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.07%

0.00%

-3.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.00%

-2.65%

-7.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.75%

2.67%

+1.08%

Volatility

DXSL.DE vs. WELH.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSL.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.00% compared to Amundi S&P Global Industrials ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELH.DE) at 3.89%. This indicates that DXSL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WELH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DXSL.DEWELH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.00%

3.89%

+2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.78%

12.20%

+3.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.33%

14.98%

+4.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.22%

15.28%

+3.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.64%

15.28%

+4.36%

DXSL.DE vs. WELH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DXSL.DE has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than WELH.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DXSL.DE vs. WELH.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither DXSL.DE nor WELH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DXSL.DE and WELH.DE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DXSL.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DXSL.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for WELH.DE.

DXSL.DE tracks MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened 20-35, while WELH.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Industrials. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for DXSL.DE and 0.18% for WELH.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DXSL.DE and WELH.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer