PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DXSE.DE vs. WRNA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DXSE.DE vs. WRNA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSE.DE) and WisdomTree BioRevolution UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRNA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXSE.DE achieves a -1.95% return, which is significantly lower than WRNA.DE's 10.48% return.


DXSE.DE

1D
2.90%
1M
1.98%
YTD
-1.95%
6M
-0.40%
1Y
4.80%
3Y*
2.51%
5Y*
5.38%
10Y*
6.10%

WRNA.DE

1D
4.08%
1M
4.18%
YTD
10.48%
6M
10.41%
1Y
48.70%
3Y*
0.92%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXSE.DE vs. WRNA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DXSE.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
-1.95%4.97%4.52%9.56%-5.75%3.89%
WRNA.DE
WisdomTree BioRevolution UCITS ETF USD Acc
10.48%9.13%-10.92%-3.37%-22.01%-0.98%

Correlation

The correlation between DXSE.DE and WRNA.DE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2021

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DXSE.DE vs. WRNA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXSE.DE
DXSE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
DXSE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXSE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXSE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
DXSE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXSE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

WRNA.DE
WRNA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
WRNA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRNA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRNA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
WRNA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRNA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXSE.DE vs. WRNA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSE.DE) and WisdomTree BioRevolution UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRNA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DXSE.DEWRNA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.30

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

3.61

-3.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.82

9.63

-8.81

DXSE.DE vs. WRNA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXSE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the WRNA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXSE.DE and WRNA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DXSE.DEWRNA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

1.75

-1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

-0.20

+0.64

Drawdowns

DXSE.DE vs. WRNA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXSE.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.30%, smaller than the maximum WRNA.DE drawdown of -52.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXSE.DE and WRNA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DXSE.DEWRNA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.30%

-52.35%

+18.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.67%

-13.42%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.10%

-40.06%

+11.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.88%

-20.73%

+6.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.34%

-27.26%

+18.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.81%

5.04%

+0.77%

Volatility

DXSE.DE vs. WRNA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSE.DE) is 5.82%, while WisdomTree BioRevolution UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRNA.DE) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that DXSE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WRNA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DXSE.DEWRNA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.82%

6.73%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.95%

17.21%

-5.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.63%

27.70%

-10.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.48%

24.22%

-7.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.04%

24.22%

-8.18%

DXSE.DE vs. WRNA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DXSE.DE has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than WRNA.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

DXSE.DE vs. WRNA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither DXSE.DE nor WRNA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DXSE.DE and WRNA.DE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DXSE.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DXSE.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WRNA.DE.

DXSE.DE tracks MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened 20-35, while WRNA.DE tracks WisdomTree BioRevolution ESG Screened. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for DXSE.DE and 0.45% for WRNA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DXSE.DE and WRNA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer