DXSE.DE vs. WELS.DE
DXSE.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) and WELS.DE (Amundi S&P Global Health Care ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - DXSE.DE tracks the MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened 20-35 while WELS.DE tracks the S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Health Care. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DXSE.DE returned 2.51%/yr vs 2.22%/yr for WELS.DE. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DXSE.DE charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for WELS.DE.
Performance
DXSE.DE vs. WELS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXSE.DE achieves a -1.95% return, which is significantly higher than WELS.DE's -3.35% return.
DXSE.DE
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- -1.95%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 4.80%
- 3Y*
- 2.51%
- 5Y*
- 5.38%
- 10Y*
- 6.10%
WELS.DE
- 1D
- 2.97%
- 1M
- 4.14%
- YTD
- -3.35%
- 6M
- -2.82%
- 1Y
- 6.93%
- 3Y*
- 2.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DXSE.DE vs. WELS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXSE.DE Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | -1.95% | 4.97% | 4.52% | 9.56% | 5.38% |
WELS.DE Amundi S&P Global Health Care ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc | -3.35% | 1.05% | 7.20% | 2.33% | 4.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXSE.DE and WELS.DE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022 | 0.70 |
The correlation between DXSE.DE and WELS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXSE.DE vs. WELS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DXSE.DE
WELS.DE
DXSE.DE vs. WELS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSE.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Health Care ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DXSE.DE | WELS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.09 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 0.56 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.82 | 1.30 | -0.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DXSE.DE | WELS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | 0.47 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.22 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
DXSE.DE vs. WELS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXSE.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.30%, which is greater than WELS.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXSE.DE and WELS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXSE.DE | WELS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.30% | -23.13% | -11.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.67% | -12.35% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.10% | -23.13% | -4.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.88% | -12.08% | -1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.34% | -7.30% | -1.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.81% | 5.34% | +0.47% |
Volatility
DXSE.DE vs. WELS.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSE.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.82% compared to Amundi S&P Global Health Care ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELS.DE) at 5.27%. This indicates that DXSE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WELS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXSE.DE | WELS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.82% | 5.27% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.95% | 10.22% | +1.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.63% | 14.60% | +3.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.48% | 13.59% | +2.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.04% | 13.59% | +2.45% |
DXSE.DE vs. WELS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DXSE.DE has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than WELS.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DXSE.DE vs. WELS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DXSE.DE nor WELS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DXSE.DE and WELS.DE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DXSE.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DXSE.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for WELS.DE.
DXSE.DE tracks MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened 20-35, while WELS.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Health Care. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for DXSE.DE and 0.18% for WELS.DE.
Find the right allocation for DXSE.DE and WELS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer