PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DXSE.DE vs. LHTC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DXSE.DE vs. LHTC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSE.DE) and Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Acc (LHTC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXSE.DE achieves a -1.95% return, which is significantly higher than LHTC.DE's -2.55% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DXSE.DE having a 6.10% annualized return and LHTC.DE not far behind at 5.88%.


DXSE.DE

1D
2.90%
1M
0.52%
YTD
-1.95%
6M
-0.32%
1Y
5.13%
3Y*
2.51%
5Y*
5.38%
10Y*
6.10%

LHTC.DE

1D
3.03%
1M
0.27%
YTD
-2.55%
6M
-1.03%
1Y
4.57%
3Y*
2.35%
5Y*
5.04%
10Y*
5.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXSE.DE vs. LHTC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DXSE.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
-1.95%4.97%4.52%9.56%-5.75%25.75%-1.94%32.90%-1.01%4.42%
LHTC.DE
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Acc
-2.55%7.11%3.92%7.59%-6.20%25.48%-1.95%27.54%2.95%4.36%

Correlation

The correlation between DXSE.DE and LHTC.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2007

0.91

The correlation between DXSE.DE and LHTC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DXSE.DE vs. LHTC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXSE.DE
DXSE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
DXSE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXSE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXSE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
DXSE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXSE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

LHTC.DE
LHTC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
LHTC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LHTC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
LHTC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
LHTC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
LHTC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXSE.DE vs. LHTC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSE.DE) and Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Acc (LHTC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DXSE.DELHTC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.07

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

0.40

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.82

0.89

-0.06

DXSE.DE vs. LHTC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXSE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is comparable to the LHTC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXSE.DE and LHTC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DXSE.DELHTC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

0.30

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.32

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.38

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.44

+0.01

Drawdowns

DXSE.DE vs. LHTC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXSE.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.30%, smaller than the maximum LHTC.DE drawdown of -40.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXSE.DE and LHTC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DXSE.DELHTC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.30%

-40.53%

+6.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.67%

-12.43%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.10%

-26.48%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.10%

-26.48%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.10%

-26.48%

-1.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.88%

-11.60%

-2.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.34%

-9.31%

+0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.81%

5.67%

+0.14%

Volatility

DXSE.DE vs. LHTC.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSE.DE) and Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Acc (LHTC.DE) have volatilities of 5.82% and 5.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DXSE.DELHTC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.82%

5.69%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.95%

11.67%

+0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.63%

16.60%

+1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.48%

15.44%

+1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.04%

15.57%

+0.47%

DXSE.DE vs. LHTC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DXSE.DE has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than LHTC.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

DXSE.DE vs. LHTC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither DXSE.DE nor LHTC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, DXSE.DE and LHTC.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, DXSE.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DXSE.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LHTC.DE.

DXSE.DE tracks MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened 20-35, while LHTC.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Health Care. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for DXSE.DE and 0.30% for LHTC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DXSE.DE and LHTC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer