PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DXSC.DE vs. XNGI.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DXSC.DE vs. XNGI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSC.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNGI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXSC.DE achieves a 8.73% return, which is significantly lower than XNGI.DE's 17.43% return.


DXSC.DE

1D
-0.44%
1M
6.46%
YTD
8.73%
6M
11.33%
1Y
8.30%
3Y*
9.32%
5Y*
4.03%
10Y*
12.15%

XNGI.DE

1D
-1.17%
1M
12.12%
YTD
17.43%
6M
16.12%
1Y
30.44%
3Y*
27.17%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXSC.DE vs. XNGI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DXSC.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
8.73%8.23%-1.25%18.77%4.97%
XNGI.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C
17.43%7.77%43.41%52.53%-14.06%

Correlation

The correlation between DXSC.DE and XNGI.DE is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2022

0.46

The correlation between DXSC.DE and XNGI.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DXSC.DE vs. XNGI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXSC.DE
DXSC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
DXSC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXSC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXSC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
DXSC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXSC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

XNGI.DE
XNGI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
XNGI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNGI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNGI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
XNGI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNGI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXSC.DE vs. XNGI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSC.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNGI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DXSC.DEXNGI.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.29

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

1.60

-1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.79

4.10

-2.31

DXSC.DE vs. XNGI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXSC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the XNGI.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXSC.DE and XNGI.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DXSC.DEXNGI.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

1.66

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

1.20

-1.13

Drawdowns

DXSC.DE vs. XNGI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXSC.DE drawdown since its inception was -73.82%, which is greater than XNGI.DE's maximum drawdown of -27.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXSC.DE and XNGI.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DXSC.DEXNGI.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.82%

-27.91%

-45.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.34%

-18.97%

+4.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.53%

-27.91%

+10.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-1.91%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.18%

-6.21%

-23.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.61%

7.40%

-2.79%

Volatility

DXSC.DE vs. XNGI.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSC.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNGI.DE) at 5.48%. This indicates that DXSC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XNGI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DXSC.DEXNGI.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.43%

5.48%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.24%

13.40%

+0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.91%

18.27%

-1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.98%

20.70%

-2.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.78%

20.70%

+3.08%

DXSC.DE vs. XNGI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DXSC.DE has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than XNGI.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

DXSC.DE vs. XNGI.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither DXSC.DE nor XNGI.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DXSC.DE and XNGI.DE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DXSC.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DXSC.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XNGI.DE.

DXSC.DE is categorized as Industrials Equities, while XNGI.DE is Technology Equities. DXSC.DE tracks MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened 20-35, while XNGI.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Next Generation Internet Innovation Select ESG Screened 100. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for DXSC.DE and 0.30% for XNGI.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DXSC.DE and XNGI.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer