DXSC.DE vs. WELH.DE
DXSC.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) and WELH.DE (Amundi S&P Global Industrials ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc) are both Industrials Equities funds - DXSC.DE tracks the MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened 20-35 while WELH.DE tracks the S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Industrials. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DXSC.DE returned 9.32%/yr vs 17.39%/yr for WELH.DE. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DXSC.DE charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for WELH.DE.
Performance
DXSC.DE vs. WELH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXSC.DE achieves a 8.73% return, which is significantly lower than WELH.DE's 15.64% return.
DXSC.DE
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 6.46%
- YTD
- 8.73%
- 6M
- 11.33%
- 1Y
- 8.30%
- 3Y*
- 9.32%
- 5Y*
- 4.03%
- 10Y*
- 12.15%
WELH.DE
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- 15.64%
- 6M
- 15.67%
- 1Y
- 24.04%
- 3Y*
- 17.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DXSC.DE vs. WELH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXSC.DE Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 8.73% | 8.23% | -1.25% | 18.77% | 10.23% |
WELH.DE Amundi S&P Global Industrials ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 15.64% | 9.85% | 16.48% | 19.96% | 7.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXSC.DE and WELH.DE is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022 | 0.63 |
The correlation between DXSC.DE and WELH.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXSC.DE vs. WELH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DXSC.DE
WELH.DE
DXSC.DE vs. WELH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSC.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Industrials ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DXSC.DE | WELH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.29 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | 2.43 | -1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.79 | 8.98 | -7.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DXSC.DE | WELH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 | 1.60 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 1.26 | -1.20 |
Drawdowns
DXSC.DE vs. WELH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXSC.DE drawdown since its inception was -73.82%, which is greater than WELH.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXSC.DE and WELH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXSC.DE | WELH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.82% | -20.70% | -53.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.34% | -9.84% | -4.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.53% | -20.70% | +3.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.80% | 0.00% | -1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.18% | -2.65% | -27.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.61% | 2.67% | +1.94% |
Volatility
DXSC.DE vs. WELH.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSC.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to Amundi S&P Global Industrials ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELH.DE) at 3.89%. This indicates that DXSC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WELH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXSC.DE | WELH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.43% | 3.89% | +2.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.24% | 12.20% | +2.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.91% | 14.98% | +1.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 15.28% | +2.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.78% | 15.28% | +8.50% |
DXSC.DE vs. WELH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DXSC.DE has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than WELH.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DXSC.DE vs. WELH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DXSC.DE nor WELH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DXSC.DE and WELH.DE have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DXSC.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DXSC.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for WELH.DE.
DXSC.DE tracks MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened 20-35, while WELH.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Industrials. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for DXSC.DE and 0.18% for WELH.DE.
Find the right allocation for DXSC.DE and WELH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer