PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DXSC.DE vs. LCHM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DXSC.DE vs. LCHM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSC.DE) and Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Chemicals UCITS ETF Acc (LCHM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXSC.DE achieves a 8.73% return, which is significantly lower than LCHM.DE's 22.92% return. Over the past 10 years, DXSC.DE has outperformed LCHM.DE with an annualized return of 12.15%, while LCHM.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.52% annualized return.


DXSC.DE

1D
-0.44%
1M
6.46%
YTD
8.73%
6M
11.33%
1Y
8.30%
3Y*
9.32%
5Y*
4.03%
10Y*
12.15%

LCHM.DE

1D
-0.50%
1M
6.36%
YTD
22.92%
6M
27.91%
1Y
34.17%
3Y*
10.91%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*
9.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXSC.DE vs. LCHM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DXSC.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
8.73%8.23%-1.25%18.77%-13.04%26.49%13.22%22.28%-12.90%22.38%
LCHM.DE
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Chemicals UCITS ETF Acc
22.92%13.24%-9.83%16.21%-14.63%24.72%10.72%24.43%-9.02%13.19%

Correlation

The correlation between DXSC.DE and LCHM.DE is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2007

0.62

Over the past year, DXSC.DE and LCHM.DE have become more correlated (0.89) than their long-term average of 0.62, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DXSC.DE vs. LCHM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXSC.DE
DXSC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
DXSC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXSC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXSC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
DXSC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXSC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

LCHM.DE
LCHM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
LCHM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCHM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCHM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
LCHM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCHM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXSC.DE vs. LCHM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSC.DE) and Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Chemicals UCITS ETF Acc (LCHM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DXSC.DELCHM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.32

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

2.55

-1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.79

10.41

-8.61

DXSC.DE vs. LCHM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXSC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the LCHM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXSC.DE and LCHM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DXSC.DELCHM.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

1.91

-1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.36

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.54

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.47

-0.40

Drawdowns

DXSC.DE vs. LCHM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXSC.DE drawdown since its inception was -73.82%, which is greater than LCHM.DE's maximum drawdown of -47.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXSC.DE and LCHM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DXSC.DELCHM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.82%

-47.72%

-26.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.34%

-13.34%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.53%

-24.12%

+6.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.63%

-24.60%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.96%

-31.17%

-13.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-1.74%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.18%

-8.36%

-21.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.61%

3.24%

+1.37%

Volatility

DXSC.DE vs. LCHM.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSC.DE) and Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Chemicals UCITS ETF Acc (LCHM.DE) have volatilities of 6.43% and 6.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DXSC.DELCHM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.43%

6.63%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.24%

14.76%

-0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.91%

17.86%

-0.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.98%

17.73%

+0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.78%

17.92%

+5.86%

DXSC.DE vs. LCHM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DXSC.DE has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than LCHM.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

DXSC.DE vs. LCHM.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither DXSC.DE nor LCHM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DXSC.DE and LCHM.DE have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DXSC.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DXSC.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LCHM.DE.

DXSC.DE tracks MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened 20-35, while LCHM.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Chemicals. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for DXSC.DE and 0.30% for LCHM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DXSC.DE and LCHM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer