DXQLX vs. PMPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXQLX) and ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Fund (PMPIX).
DXQLX is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the . It was launched on May 1, 2006. PMPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Jun 2, 2002.
Performance
DXQLX vs. PMPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DXQLX vs. PMPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXQLX Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund | -16.65% | 29.99% | 39.26% | 97.59% | -57.72% | 55.98% | 100.94% | 79.36% | -81.54% | 743.06% |
PMPIX ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Fund | -0.39% | 273.51% | 5.35% | -1.78% | -20.47% | -14.71% | 28.27% | 72.99% | -21.10% | 6.55% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXQLX achieves a -16.65% return, which is significantly lower than PMPIX's -0.39% return. Over the past 10 years, DXQLX has outperformed PMPIX with an annualized return of 28.82%, while PMPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 16.99% annualized return.
DXQLX
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -14.31%
- YTD
- -16.65%
- 6M
- -14.21%
- 1Y
- 28.10%
- 3Y*
- 30.01%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 28.82%
PMPIX
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- -35.81%
- YTD
- -0.39%
- 6M
- 16.28%
- 1Y
- 139.44%
- 3Y*
- 50.72%
- 5Y*
- 24.38%
- 10Y*
- 16.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DXQLX vs. PMPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DXQLX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PMPIX's 1.53% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DXQLX vs. PMPIX — Risk / Return Rank
DXQLX
PMPIX
DXQLX vs. PMPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXQLX) and ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Fund (PMPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DXQLX | PMPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.70 | 2.13 | -1.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.31 | 2.27 | -0.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.34 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 3.38 | -2.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.53 | 11.61 | -8.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DXQLX | PMPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 2.13 | -1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.47 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 | 0.32 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.08 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between DXQLX and PMPIX is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DXQLX vs. PMPIX - Dividend Comparison
DXQLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.75%, more than PMPIX's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXQLX Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund | 17.75% | 14.50% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.75% | 10.90% | 3.37% | 7.37% | 5.72% |
PMPIX ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Fund | 0.43% | 0.43% | 1.89% | 1.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DXQLX vs. PMPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXQLX drawdown since its inception was -97.24%, roughly equal to the maximum PMPIX drawdown of -94.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXQLX and PMPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXQLX | PMPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.24% | -94.34% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.05% | -41.66% | +19.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.79% | -61.05% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.23% | -65.94% | -21.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.88% | -42.59% | +20.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.36% | -59.86% | -6.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.20% | 12.13% | -5.93% |
Volatility
DXQLX vs. PMPIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXQLX) is 9.63%, while ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Fund (PMPIX) has a volatility of 23.48%. This indicates that DXQLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PMPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DXQLX | PMPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.63% | 23.48% | -13.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.96% | 55.98% | -34.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.19% | 67.44% | -27.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.24% | 52.07% | -9.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 316.44% | 52.81% | +263.63% |