DXQLX vs. PGTYX
Compare and contrast key facts about Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXQLX) and Putnam Global Technology Fund (PGTYX).
DXQLX is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the . It was launched on May 1, 2006. PGTYX is managed by Putnam. It was launched on Dec 17, 2008.
Performance
DXQLX vs. PGTYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DXQLX vs. PGTYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXQLX Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund | -16.65% | 29.99% | 39.26% | 97.59% | -57.72% | 55.98% | 100.94% | 79.36% | -81.54% | 743.06% |
PGTYX Putnam Global Technology Fund | -8.01% | 23.31% | 27.88% | 53.82% | -32.30% | 11.72% | 70.92% | 47.50% | -6.72% | 47.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXQLX achieves a -16.65% return, which is significantly lower than PGTYX's -8.01% return. Over the past 10 years, DXQLX has outperformed PGTYX with an annualized return of 28.82%, while PGTYX has yielded a comparatively lower 20.82% annualized return.
DXQLX
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -14.31%
- YTD
- -16.65%
- 6M
- -14.21%
- 1Y
- 28.10%
- 3Y*
- 30.01%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 28.82%
PGTYX
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- -8.35%
- YTD
- -8.01%
- 6M
- -7.68%
- 1Y
- 30.83%
- 3Y*
- 21.76%
- 5Y*
- 10.37%
- 10Y*
- 20.82%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DXQLX vs. PGTYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DXQLX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than PGTYX's 0.62% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DXQLX vs. PGTYX — Risk / Return Rank
DXQLX
PGTYX
DXQLX vs. PGTYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXQLX) and Putnam Global Technology Fund (PGTYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DXQLX | PGTYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.70 | 1.09 | -0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.31 | 1.63 | -0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.23 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 1.84 | -0.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.53 | 5.89 | -2.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DXQLX | PGTYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 1.09 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.42 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 | 0.88 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.84 | -0.83 |
Correlation
The correlation between DXQLX and PGTYX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DXQLX vs. PGTYX - Dividend Comparison
DXQLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.75%, more than PGTYX's 11.77% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXQLX Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund | 17.75% | 14.50% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.75% | 10.90% | 3.37% | 7.37% | 5.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PGTYX Putnam Global Technology Fund | 11.77% | 10.83% | 6.40% | 0.57% | 1.71% | 21.15% | 13.60% | 2.63% | 9.44% | 6.75% | 1.01% | 4.56% |
Drawdowns
DXQLX vs. PGTYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXQLX drawdown since its inception was -97.24%, which is greater than PGTYX's maximum drawdown of -42.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXQLX and PGTYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXQLX | PGTYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.24% | -42.09% | -55.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.05% | -14.51% | -7.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.79% | -42.09% | -18.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.23% | -42.09% | -45.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.88% | -13.58% | -8.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.36% | -6.66% | -59.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.20% | 4.54% | +1.66% |
Volatility
DXQLX vs. PGTYX - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXQLX) has a higher volatility of 9.63% compared to Putnam Global Technology Fund (PGTYX) at 8.10%. This indicates that DXQLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGTYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DXQLX | PGTYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.63% | 8.10% | +1.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.96% | 16.61% | +5.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.19% | 28.03% | +12.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.24% | 24.67% | +17.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 316.44% | 23.87% | +292.57% |