DXQLX vs. AMAGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXQLX) and Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX).
DXQLX is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the . It was launched on May 1, 2006. AMAGX is managed by Amana. It was launched on Feb 3, 1994.
Performance
DXQLX vs. AMAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DXQLX vs. AMAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXQLX Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund | -16.65% | 29.99% | 39.26% | 97.59% | -57.72% | 55.98% | 100.94% | 79.36% | -81.54% | 743.06% |
AMAGX Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund | -6.55% | 17.62% | 15.73% | 25.67% | -19.49% | 31.51% | 32.93% | 33.09% | 2.47% | 28.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXQLX achieves a -16.65% return, which is significantly lower than AMAGX's -6.55% return. Over the past 10 years, DXQLX has outperformed AMAGX with an annualized return of 28.82%, while AMAGX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.34% annualized return.
DXQLX
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -14.31%
- YTD
- -16.65%
- 6M
- -14.21%
- 1Y
- 28.10%
- 3Y*
- 30.01%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 28.82%
AMAGX
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -9.83%
- YTD
- -6.55%
- 6M
- -4.04%
- 1Y
- 19.84%
- 3Y*
- 14.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.31%
- 10Y*
- 15.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DXQLX vs. AMAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DXQLX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than AMAGX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DXQLX vs. AMAGX — Risk / Return Rank
DXQLX
AMAGX
DXQLX vs. AMAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXQLX) and Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DXQLX | AMAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.70 | 1.02 | -0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.31 | 1.54 | -0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.22 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 1.52 | -0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.53 | 6.41 | -2.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DXQLX | AMAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 1.02 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.57 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 | 0.84 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.64 | -0.63 |
Correlation
The correlation between DXQLX and AMAGX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DXQLX vs. AMAGX - Dividend Comparison
DXQLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.75%, while AMAGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXQLX Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund | 17.75% | 14.50% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.75% | 10.90% | 3.37% | 7.37% | 5.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AMAGX Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.95% | 0.65% | 3.64% | 0.52% | 5.44% | 3.15% | 3.47% | 10.90% | 13.67% | 7.45% |
Drawdowns
DXQLX vs. AMAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXQLX drawdown since its inception was -97.24%, which is greater than AMAGX's maximum drawdown of -57.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXQLX and AMAGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXQLX | AMAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.24% | -57.64% | -39.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.05% | -11.84% | -10.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.79% | -28.09% | -32.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.23% | -28.09% | -59.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.88% | -11.04% | -10.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.36% | -10.32% | -56.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.20% | 2.80% | +3.40% |
Volatility
DXQLX vs. AMAGX - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXQLX) has a higher volatility of 9.63% compared to Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX) at 5.96%. This indicates that DXQLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DXQLX | AMAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.63% | 5.96% | +3.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.96% | 12.00% | +9.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.19% | 20.16% | +20.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.24% | 18.18% | +24.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 316.44% | 18.27% | +298.17% |