DXO.TO vs. MFT.TO
DXO.TO (Dynamic Active Crossover Bond ETF) and MFT.TO (Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DXO.TO returned 2.78%/yr vs 3.71%/yr for MFT.TO. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DXO.TO vs. MFT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXO.TO achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly lower than MFT.TO's 2.53% return.
DXO.TO
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 5.69%
- 3Y*
- 7.29%
- 5Y*
- 2.78%
- 10Y*
- —
MFT.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- YTD
- 2.53%
- 1Y
- 2.43%
- 3Y*
- 5.49%
- 5Y*
- 3.71%
- 10Y*
- 4.41%
DXO.TO vs. MFT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXO.TO Dynamic Active Crossover Bond ETF | 1.86% | 6.82% | 6.51% | 11.28% | -12.16% | 5.03% | 10.15% | 12.26% | -1.94% | 4.52% |
MFT.TO Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF | 2.53% | 0.81% | 8.84% | 11.99% | -6.31% | 5.56% | -0.64% | 6.00% | 2.29% | 7.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXO.TO and MFT.TO is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2017 | 0.08 |
The correlation between DXO.TO and MFT.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.12 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXO.TO vs. MFT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DXO.TO
MFT.TO
DXO.TO vs. MFT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynamic Active Crossover Bond ETF (DXO.TO) and Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF (MFT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DXO.TO | MFT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.16 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 1.84 | +0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.24 | 4.39 | +5.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DXO.TO vs. MFT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXO.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.61%, smaller than the maximum MFT.TO drawdown of -20.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXO.TO and MFT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXO.TO | MFT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.61% | -20.87% | +3.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.41% | -1.33% | -1.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.78% | -3.40% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.91% | -7.45% | -8.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | 0.00% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.94% | -1.38% | -1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | 0.55% | +0.01% |
Volatility
DXO.TO vs. MFT.TO - Volatility Comparison
Dynamic Active Crossover Bond ETF (DXO.TO) has a higher volatility of 0.97% compared to Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF (MFT.TO) at 0.79%. This indicates that DXO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXO.TO | MFT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.97% | 0.79% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.65% | 1.80% | +0.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.34% | 2.61% | +0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.63% | 3.71% | +1.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.74% | 5.10% | +2.64% |
Dividends
DXO.TO vs. MFT.TO - Dividend Comparison
DXO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, less than MFT.TO's 8.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXO.TO Dynamic Active Crossover Bond ETF | 5.31% | 5.55% | 5.61% | 5.65% | 5.29% | 4.15% | 4.20% | 3.96% | 4.31% | 2.15% | 0.00% |
MFT.TO Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF | 8.29% | 8.57% | 9.44% | 10.40% | 6.26% | 3.89% | 6.18% | 6.97% | 6.14% | 4.84% | 3.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DXO.TO and MFT.TO have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Dynamic and Mackenzie.
Find the right allocation for DXO.TO and MFT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer