DXO.TO vs. DXN.TO
DXO.TO (Dynamic Active Crossover Bond ETF) and DXN.TO (Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DXO.TO is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by Dynamic, while DXN.TO is a Industrials Equities fund actively managed by Dynamic. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DXO.TO returned 2.78%/yr vs 9.42%/yr for DXN.TO. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DXO.TO vs. DXN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXO.TO achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly lower than DXN.TO's 13.74% return.
DXO.TO
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 5.69%
- 3Y*
- 7.29%
- 5Y*
- 2.78%
- 10Y*
- —
DXN.TO
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 12.29%
- YTD
- 13.74%
- 1Y
- 19.11%
- 3Y*
- 13.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.42%
- 10Y*
- —
DXO.TO vs. DXN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXO.TO Dynamic Active Crossover Bond ETF | 1.86% | 6.82% | 6.51% | 11.28% | -12.16% | 5.03% | 7.72% |
DXN.TO Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF | 13.74% | 15.33% | 15.13% | -0.89% | -1.00% | 10.60% | -7.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXO.TO and DXN.TO is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2020 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXO.TO vs. DXN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DXO.TO
DXN.TO
DXO.TO vs. DXN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynamic Active Crossover Bond ETF (DXO.TO) and Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF (DXN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DXO.TO | DXN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.32 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 3.08 | -0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.24 | 9.32 | +0.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DXO.TO vs. DXN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXO.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.61%, smaller than the maximum DXN.TO drawdown of -34.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXO.TO and DXN.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXO.TO | DXN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.61% | -34.85% | +17.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.41% | -6.50% | +4.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.78% | -14.79% | +11.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.91% | -18.55% | +2.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -1.25% | +0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.94% | -5.74% | +2.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | 2.14% | -1.58% |
Volatility
DXO.TO vs. DXN.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dynamic Active Crossover Bond ETF (DXO.TO) is 0.97%, while Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF (DXN.TO) has a volatility of 2.92%. This indicates that DXO.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXO.TO | DXN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.97% | 2.92% | -1.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.65% | 8.88% | -6.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.34% | 11.16% | -7.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.63% | 12.85% | -7.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.74% | 16.67% | -8.93% |
Dividends
DXO.TO vs. DXN.TO - Dividend Comparison
DXO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, more than DXN.TO's 1.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXN.TO Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF | 1.98% | 2.10% | 3.26% | 2.30% | 1.21% | 0.91% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DXO.TO Dynamic Active Crossover Bond ETF | 5.31% | 5.55% | 5.61% | 5.65% | 5.29% | 4.15% | 4.20% | 3.96% | 4.31% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DXO.TO and DXN.TO have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DXO.TO is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while DXN.TO is Industrials Equities.
Find the right allocation for DXO.TO and DXN.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer