PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DXJA.L vs. N4US.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DXJA.L vs. N4US.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (DXJA.L) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (N4US.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXJA.L achieves a 20.17% return, which is significantly higher than N4US.L's 18.80% return.


DXJA.L

1D
-2.34%
1M
-2.57%
6M
11.14%
YTD
20.17%
1Y
50.98%
3Y*
31.14%
5Y*
26.73%
10Y*

N4US.L

1D
-2.01%
1M
-2.75%
6M
11.38%
YTD
18.80%
1Y
45.47%
3Y*
27.49%
5Y*
21.88%
10Y*
16.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXJA.L vs. N4US.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DXJA.L
WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc
20.17%33.46%28.94%41.24%6.24%17.35%4.48%17.49%-18.94%18.13%
N4US.L
Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc)
18.80%30.25%23.77%35.97%-1.05%11.18%10.79%19.49%-15.75%19.63%

Correlation

The correlation between DXJA.L and N4US.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2017

0.91

The correlation between DXJA.L and N4US.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DXJA.L vs. N4US.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXJA.L
DXJA.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DXJA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXJA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXJA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DXJA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXJA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

N4US.L
N4US.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
N4US.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
N4US.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
N4US.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
N4US.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
N4US.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXJA.L vs. N4US.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (DXJA.L) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (N4US.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DXJA.LN4US.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.42

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.02

4.84

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.22

16.48

+0.74

DXJA.L vs. N4US.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXJA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the N4US.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXJA.L and N4US.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DXJA.L vs. N4US.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXJA.L drawdown since its inception was -37.51%, which is greater than N4US.L's maximum drawdown of -30.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXJA.L and N4US.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DXJA.LN4US.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.51%

-30.94%

-6.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.10%

-9.35%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.01%

-21.38%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.01%

-21.38%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.25%

-4.48%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.66%

-6.78%

+0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

2.75%

+0.20%

Volatility

DXJA.L vs. N4US.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (DXJA.L) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (N4US.L) have volatilities of 6.13% and 6.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DXJA.LN4US.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.13%

6.15%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.33%

15.63%

+0.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.25%

19.57%

+0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.42%

18.50%

+0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.25%

18.38%

+0.87%

DXJA.L vs. N4US.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DXJA.L has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than N4US.L's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

DXJA.L vs. N4US.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither DXJA.L nor N4US.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, DXJA.L and N4US.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, N4US.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

N4US.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DXJA.L.

DXJA.L tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity UCITS Index, while N4US.L tracks JPX-Nikkei 400 USD Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for DXJA.L and 0.19% for N4US.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DXJA.L and N4US.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer