PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DXJA.L vs. INTL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DXJA.L vs. INTL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (DXJA.L) and WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DXJA.L is traded in USD, while INTL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the INTL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXJA.L achieves a 20.38% return, which is significantly lower than INTL.L's 48.66% return.


DXJA.L

1D
0.47%
1M
6.13%
YTD
20.38%
6M
24.05%
1Y
56.41%
3Y*
33.63%
5Y*
26.06%
10Y*

INTL.L

1D
-0.67%
1M
18.66%
YTD
48.66%
6M
49.24%
1Y
91.38%
3Y*
34.19%
5Y*
16.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXJA.L vs. INTL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DXJA.L
WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc
20.38%33.47%28.93%41.24%6.17%17.72%3.40%13.87%
INTL.L
WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc
48.66%23.14%11.68%56.56%-42.06%16.29%74.16%35.80%

Correlation

The correlation between DXJA.L and INTL.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2019

0.39

DXJA.L vs. INTL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DXJA.L
INTL.L

Industrials

28.3%
2.4%

Financial Services

19.4%
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

16.4%
5.6%

Technology

12.8%
79.3%

Basic Materials

7.5%

-

Healthcare

7.1%
2.4%

Communication Services

4.0%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
0.8%

Energy

2.0%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

DXJA.L
28.3%
INTL.L
2.4%

Financial Services

DXJA.L
19.4%
INTL.L
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DXJA.L
16.4%
INTL.L
5.6%

Technology

DXJA.L
12.8%
INTL.L
79.3%

Basic Materials

DXJA.L
7.5%
INTL.L

-

Healthcare

DXJA.L
7.1%
INTL.L
2.4%

Communication Services

DXJA.L
4.0%
INTL.L
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

DXJA.L
2.6%
INTL.L
0.8%

Energy

DXJA.L
2.0%
INTL.L

-

Real Estate

DXJA.L

-

INTL.L

-

Utilities

DXJA.L

-

INTL.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DXJA.L vs. INTL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXJA.L
DXJA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DXJA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXJA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXJA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DXJA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXJA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

INTL.L
INTL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
INTL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
INTL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXJA.L vs. INTL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (DXJA.L) and WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DXJA.LINTL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.52

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.56

5.91

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.58

18.42

+1.16

DXJA.L vs. INTL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXJA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is comparable to the INTL.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXJA.L and INTL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DXJA.LINTL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89

3.47

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.49

0.58

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

0.91

+0.21

Drawdowns

DXJA.L vs. INTL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXJA.L drawdown since its inception was -37.52%, smaller than the maximum INTL.L drawdown of -48.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXJA.L and INTL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DXJA.LINTL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.52%

-48.41%

+10.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.10%

-15.38%

+5.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.00%

-31.15%

+8.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.00%

-46.21%

+23.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.19%

+1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

-13.96%

+8.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

4.94%

-2.07%

Volatility

DXJA.L vs. INTL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (DXJA.L) is 4.11%, while WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L) has a volatility of 9.61%. This indicates that DXJA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DXJA.LINTL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

9.61%

-5.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.45%

19.60%

-4.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.45%

26.18%

-6.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.94%

27.54%

-6.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.87%

28.09%

-4.22%

DXJA.L vs. INTL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DXJA.L has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than INTL.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

DXJA.L vs. INTL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither DXJA.L nor INTL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DXJA.L and INTL.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, INTL.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

INTL.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DXJA.L.

DXJA.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while INTL.L is Technology Equities. DXJA.L tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity UCITS Index, while INTL.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for DXJA.L and 0.40% for INTL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DXJA.L and INTL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer