DXF.TO vs. HBNK.TO
DXF.TO (Dynamic Active Global Financial Services ETF) and HBNK.TO (Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. DXF.TO is actively managed, while HBNK.TO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DXF.TO returned 22.24%/yr vs 37.95%/yr for HBNK.TO. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DXF.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXF.TO achieves a 3.02% return, which is significantly lower than HBNK.TO's 36.76% return.
DXF.TO
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 5.32%
- 6M
- 2.37%
- YTD
- 3.02%
- 1Y
- 6.55%
- 3Y*
- 22.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.90%
- 10Y*
- —
HBNK.TO
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- 9.13%
- 6M
- 35.31%
- YTD
- 36.76%
- 1Y
- 75.14%
- 3Y*
- 37.95%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DXF.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DXF.TO Dynamic Active Global Financial Services ETF | 3.02% | 17.12% | 36.17% | 13.73% |
HBNK.TO Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 36.76% | 43.71% | 24.77% | 9.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXF.TO and HBNK.TO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2023 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXF.TO vs. HBNK.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DXF.TO
HBNK.TO
DXF.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynamic Active Global Financial Services ETF (DXF.TO) and Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (HBNK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DXF.TO | HBNK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 2.00 | -0.91 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 8.91 | -8.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.94 | 38.63 | -37.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DXF.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXF.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.27%, which is greater than HBNK.TO's maximum drawdown of -14.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXF.TO and HBNK.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXF.TO | HBNK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.27% | -14.78% | -20.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.42% | -8.48% | -5.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.42% | -14.78% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | 0.00% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.67% | -2.24% | -5.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.76% | 1.95% | +3.81% |
Volatility
DXF.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Volatility Comparison
Dynamic Active Global Financial Services ETF (DXF.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.98% compared to Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (HBNK.TO) at 4.00%. This indicates that DXF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HBNK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXF.TO | HBNK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.98% | 4.00% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.87% | 11.63% | -1.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.17% | 13.39% | -1.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 12.77% | +3.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.35% | 12.77% | +9.58% |
Dividends
DXF.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Dividend Comparison
DXF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than HBNK.TO's 2.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXF.TO Dynamic Active Global Financial Services ETF | 1.10% | 1.13% | 1.18% | 2.14% | 1.95% | 1.07% | 1.30% | 1.40% | 2.08% |
HBNK.TO Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 2.47% | 3.24% | 4.15% | 2.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DXF.TO and HBNK.TO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Dynamic and Global X.
Find the right allocation for DXF.TO and HBNK.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer