PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DXF.TO vs. CFOU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

DXF.TO vs. CFOU.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

DXF.TO (Dynamic Active Global Financial Services ETF) and CFOU.TO (BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DXF.TO is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Dynamic, while CFOU.TO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index. DXF.TO is actively managed, while CFOU.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DXF.TO returned 9.90%/yr vs 35.25%/yr for CFOU.TO. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

DXF.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Dynamic Active Global Financial Services ETF (DXF.TO) and BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXF.TO achieves a 3.02% return, which is significantly lower than CFOU.TO's 55.99% return.

DXF.TO

1D
0.11%
1M
5.32%
6M
2.37%
YTD
3.02%
1Y
6.55%
3Y*
22.24%
5Y*
9.90%
10Y*
—

CFOU.TO

1D
3.03%
1M
14.19%
6M
52.95%
YTD
55.99%
1Y
124.75%
3Y*
66.87%
5Y*
35.25%
10Y*
26.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXF.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DXF.TO
Dynamic Active Global Financial Services ETF		3.02%17.12%36.17%18.06%-19.33%23.02%9.67%42.59%-8.42%5.02%
CFOU.TO
BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF		55.99%69.17%56.15%18.37%-23.64%79.61%-14.72%40.48%-21.69%6.41%

Correlation

The correlation between DXF.TO and CFOU.TO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2017

0.34

The correlation between DXF.TO and CFOU.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Dynamic Active Global Financial Services ETF

BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF

Often compared with CFOU.TO:
CFOU.TO vs. METE.TOCFOU.TO vs. TCND.TOCFOU.TO vs. ESGC.TOCFOU.TO vs. CACE.TOCFOU.TO vs. HCAL.TOCFOU.TO vs. HBNK.TOCFOU.TO vs. RBNK.TO

Return for Risk

DXF.TO vs. CFOU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
DXF.TO
DXF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
DXF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
DXF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
CFOU.TO
CFOU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CFOU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFOU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFOU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CFOU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFOU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXF.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynamic Active Global Financial Services ETF (DXF.TO) and BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

DXF.TOCFOU.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.44
4.91

-4.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.73
5.43

-4.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.72

-0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

7.80

-7.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.94

31.88

-30.95

DXF.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the CFOU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXF.TO and CFOU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DXF.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXF.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.27%, smaller than the maximum CFOU.TO drawdown of -86.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXF.TO and CFOU.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

DXF.TOCFOU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.27%

-86.23%

+50.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.42%

-16.08%

+1.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.42%

-24.95%

+10.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.06%

-45.23%

+16.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-67.30%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

0.00%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.67%

-22.31%

+14.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.76%

3.93%

+1.83%

Volatility

DXF.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dynamic Active Global Financial Services ETF (DXF.TO) is 4.98%, while BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO) has a volatility of 6.90%. This indicates that DXF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFOU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

DXF.TOCFOU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.98%

6.90%

-1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.87%

21.51%

-11.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

25.59%

-13.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.76%

27.69%

-10.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.35%

33.80%

-11.45%

Dividends

DXF.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Dividend Comparison

DXF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, while CFOU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CFOU.TO
BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DXF.TO
Dynamic Active Global Financial Services ETF		1.10%1.13%1.18%2.14%1.95%1.07%1.30%1.40%2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

DXF.TO and CFOU.TO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DXF.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while CFOU.TO is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dynamic and Global X.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DXF.TO and CFOU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer