DXB.TO vs. DXF.TO
DXB.TO (Dynamic Active Tactical Bond ETF) and DXF.TO (Dynamic Active Global Financial Services ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DXB.TO is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Dynamic, while DXF.TO is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Dynamic. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DXB.TO returned 0.58%/yr vs 9.90%/yr for DXF.TO. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DXB.TO vs. DXF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXB.TO achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly lower than DXF.TO's 3.02% return.
DXB.TO
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- 6M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 5.50%
- 3Y*
- 4.09%
- 5Y*
- 0.58%
- 10Y*
- —
DXF.TO
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 5.32%
- 6M
- 2.37%
- YTD
- 3.02%
- 1Y
- 6.55%
- 3Y*
- 22.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.90%
- 10Y*
- —
DXB.TO vs. DXF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXB.TO Dynamic Active Tactical Bond ETF | 1.82% | 4.44% | 0.76% | 7.43% | -10.77% | -2.77% | 8.57% | 5.19% | 1.46% | 1.44% |
DXF.TO Dynamic Active Global Financial Services ETF | 3.02% | 17.12% | 36.17% | 18.06% | -19.33% | 23.02% | 9.67% | 42.59% | -8.42% | 5.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXB.TO and DXF.TO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2017 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXB.TO vs. DXF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DXB.TO
DXF.TO
DXB.TO vs. DXF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynamic Active Tactical Bond ETF (DXB.TO) and Dynamic Active Global Financial Services ETF (DXF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DXB.TO | DXF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.09 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 0.38 | +2.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.69 | 0.94 | +5.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DXB.TO vs. DXF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXB.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.90%, smaller than the maximum DXF.TO drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXB.TO and DXF.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXB.TO | DXF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.90% | -35.27% | +17.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.05% | -14.42% | +12.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.11% | -14.42% | +9.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.58% | -29.06% | +13.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -0.05% | -0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.10% | -7.67% | +2.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.82% | 5.76% | -4.94% |
Volatility
DXB.TO vs. DXF.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dynamic Active Tactical Bond ETF (DXB.TO) is 1.16%, while Dynamic Active Global Financial Services ETF (DXF.TO) has a volatility of 4.98%. This indicates that DXB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXB.TO | DXF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | 4.98% | -3.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.14% | 9.87% | -6.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.00% | 12.17% | -8.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.51% | 16.76% | -10.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.79% | 22.35% | -15.56% |
Dividends
DXB.TO vs. DXF.TO - Dividend Comparison
DXB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than DXF.TO's 1.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXB.TO Dynamic Active Tactical Bond ETF | 4.31% | 4.30% | 4.30% | 3.81% | 2.84% | 2.44% | 2.32% | 2.46% | 2.53% | 0.74% |
DXF.TO Dynamic Active Global Financial Services ETF | 1.10% | 1.13% | 1.18% | 2.14% | 1.95% | 1.07% | 1.30% | 1.40% | 2.08% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DXB.TO and DXF.TO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DXB.TO is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while DXF.TO is Financials Equities.
Find the right allocation for DXB.TO and DXF.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer