DX2E.DE vs. CSY9.DE
DX2E.DE (Xtrackers S&P Global Infrastructure Swap UCITS ETF (Acc)) and CSY9.DE (CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD) are both Global Equities funds - DX2E.DE tracks the S&P Global Infrastructure Net Total Return Index while CSY9.DE tracks the MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DX2E.DE returned 19.44% vs 8.87% for CSY9.DE. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DX2E.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CSY9.DE.
Performance
DX2E.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DX2E.DE achieves a 13.27% return, which is significantly higher than CSY9.DE's 6.58% return.
DX2E.DE
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- 6M
- 12.67%
- YTD
- 13.27%
- 1Y
- 19.44%
- 3Y*
- 13.69%
- 5Y*
- 11.43%
- 10Y*
- 7.54%
CSY9.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- 6M
- 7.81%
- YTD
- 6.58%
- 1Y
- 8.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DX2E.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DX2E.DE Xtrackers S&P Global Infrastructure Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) | 13.27% | 7.67% | 9.09% |
CSY9.DE CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD | 6.58% | -0.67% | 3.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between DX2E.DE and CSY9.DE is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2024 | 0.54 |
The correlation between DX2E.DE and CSY9.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DX2E.DE vs. CSY9.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DX2E.DE
CSY9.DE
DX2E.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P Global Infrastructure Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (DX2E.DE) and CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DX2E.DE | CSY9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.19 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.04 | 1.99 | +2.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.10 | 5.64 | +4.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DX2E.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DX2E.DE drawdown since its inception was -63.84%, which is greater than CSY9.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DX2E.DE and CSY9.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DX2E.DE | CSY9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.84% | -13.92% | -49.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.79% | -4.48% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.95% | 0.00% | -0.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.85% | -4.70% | -14.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 1.58% | +0.34% |
Volatility
DX2E.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers S&P Global Infrastructure Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (DX2E.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE) at 2.07%. This indicates that DX2E.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSY9.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DX2E.DE | CSY9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.27% | 2.07% | +1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.89% | 5.58% | +2.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.91% | 8.17% | +1.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.23% | 10.91% | +1.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 10.91% | +3.84% |
DX2E.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DX2E.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CSY9.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
DX2E.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DX2E.DE nor CSY9.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DX2E.DE and CSY9.DE have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSY9.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSY9.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DX2E.DE.
DX2E.DE tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Net Total Return Index, while CSY9.DE tracks MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Credit Suisse. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DX2E.DE and 0.25% for CSY9.DE.
Find the right allocation for DX2E.DE and CSY9.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer