DWGAX vs. LCSMX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

DWGAX (American Funds Developing World Growth and Income Fund) and LCSMX (Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 5 years, DWGAX returned 5.11%/yr vs 10.88%/yr for LCSMX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DWGAX charges 1.23%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for LCSMX.

Performance

DWGAX vs. LCSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Developing World Growth and Income Fund (DWGAX) and Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund (LCSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWGAX achieves a 17.41% return, which is significantly lower than LCSMX's 59.82% return.

DWGAX

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -0.13%
• YTD: 17.41%
• 6M: 17.66%
• 1Y: 34.56%
• 3Y*: 19.04%
• 5Y*: 5.11%
• 10Y*: 8.16%

LCSMX

• 1D: 1.16%
• 1M: 0.92%
• YTD: 59.82%
• 6M: 64.72%
• 1Y: 108.28%
• 3Y*: 29.76%
• 5Y*: 10.88%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWGAX vs. LCSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DWGAX American Funds Developing World Growth and Income Fund	17.41%	34.25%	3.57%	11.28%	-23.47%	0.50%	12.07%	23.50%	-16.39%
LCSMX Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund	59.82%	51.52%	-13.60%	16.26%	-27.25%	4.73%	35.72%	6.81%	1.42%

Correlation

The correlation between DWGAX and LCSMX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2018	0.76

The correlation between DWGAX and LCSMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DWGAX vs. LCSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWGAX

DWGAX Risk / Return Rank: 65
DWGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
DWGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
DWGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
DWGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
DWGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

LCSMX

LCSMX Risk / Return Rank: 95
LCSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
LCSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
LCSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
LCSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
LCSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWGAX vs. LCSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Developing World Growth and Income Fund (DWGAX) and Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund (LCSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DWGAX	LCSMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	3.64	-1.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	3.76	-1.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.65	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	7.20	-4.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.77	25.66	-15.90

DWGAX vs. LCSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWGAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is lower than the LCSMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWGAX and LCSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DWGAX vs. LCSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWGAX drawdown since its inception was -38.71%, roughly equal to the maximum LCSMX drawdown of -39.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWGAX and LCSMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DWGAX	LCSMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.71%	-39.72%	+1.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.26%	-15.39%	+2.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.68%	-23.31%	+8.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.06%	-39.72%	+1.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.90%	-7.15%	+3.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.87%	-13.67%	-0.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.58%	4.31%	-0.73%

Volatility

DWGAX vs. LCSMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Developing World Growth and Income Fund (DWGAX) is 8.95%, while Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund (LCSMX) has a volatility of 19.26%. This indicates that DWGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DWGAX	LCSMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.95%	19.26%	-10.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.31%	28.62%	-13.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.37%	30.57%	-13.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.67%	20.70%	-4.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.59%	20.81%	-4.22%

DWGAX vs. LCSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWGAX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than LCSMX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

DWGAX vs. LCSMX - Dividend Comparison

DWGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than LCSMX's 0.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DWGAX American Funds Developing World Growth and Income Fund	1.35%	1.87%	1.12%	1.63%	1.09%	1.01%	1.46%	1.81%	2.28%	2.02%	2.01%	2.05%
LCSMX Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund	0.62%	1.00%	1.29%	1.22%	1.11%	3.03%	0.48%	0.88%	1.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DWGAX and LCSMX in my portfolio?

DWGAX and LCSMX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DWGAX or LCSMX?

LCSMX has higher volatility (19.26%) compared to DWGAX (8.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWGAX dropped -38.71% vs LCSMX's -39.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LCSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.64 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.