PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWGAX vs. HLFMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWGAX vs. HLFMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Developing World Growth and Income Fund (DWGAX) and Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWGAX achieves a 15.24% return, which is significantly higher than HLFMX's 7.50% return. Over the past 10 years, DWGAX has outperformed HLFMX with an annualized return of 7.08%, while HLFMX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.44% annualized return.


DWGAX

1D
-0.99%
1M
0.76%
6M
6.51%
YTD
15.24%
1Y
30.70%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
5.36%
10Y*
7.08%
ALL TIME*
5.20%

HLFMX

1D
1.48%
1M
2.45%
6M
-1.13%
YTD
7.50%
1Y
11.49%
3Y*
11.55%
5Y*
5.08%
10Y*
4.44%
ALL TIME*
1.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DWGAX vs. HLFMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DWGAX
American Funds Developing World Growth and Income Fund
15.24%34.25%3.57%11.28%-23.47%0.50%12.07%23.50%-14.90%27.69%
HLFMX
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund
7.50%16.95%8.76%10.43%-18.91%10.18%0.11%10.88%-15.45%25.08%

Correlation

The correlation between DWGAX and HLFMX is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2014

0.62

The correlation between DWGAX and HLFMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWGAX vs. HLFMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DWGAX
DWGAX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DWGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DWGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

HLFMX
HLFMX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
HLFMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLFMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLFMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
HLFMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLFMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DWGAX vs. HLFMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Developing World Growth and Income Fund (DWGAX) and Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DWGAXHLFMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.21

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

1.20

+1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.09

2.96

+5.13

DWGAX vs. HLFMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWGAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the HLFMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWGAX and HLFMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DWGAX vs. HLFMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWGAX drawdown since its inception was -38.71%, smaller than the maximum HLFMX drawdown of -63.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWGAX and HLFMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWGAXHLFMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.71%

-63.95%

+25.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.26%

-11.09%

-2.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.68%

-11.79%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.83%

-28.37%

-9.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.71%

-46.61%

+7.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.67%

-2.34%

-3.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.80%

-19.12%

+5.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.06%

4.50%

-0.44%

Volatility

DWGAX vs. HLFMX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Developing World Growth and Income Fund (DWGAX) has a higher volatility of 8.26% compared to Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX) at 3.74%. This indicates that DWGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLFMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWGAXHLFMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.26%

3.74%

+4.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.01%

11.12%

+5.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.08%

12.48%

+6.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.93%

10.68%

+6.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.77%

11.96%

+4.81%

DWGAX vs. HLFMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWGAX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is lower than HLFMX's 1.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWGAX vs. HLFMX - Dividend Comparison

DWGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than HLFMX's 3.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DWGAX
American Funds Developing World Growth and Income Fund
1.38%1.87%1.12%1.63%1.09%1.01%1.46%1.81%2.28%2.02%2.01%2.05%
HLFMX
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund
3.31%3.56%1.88%1.77%2.28%0.83%1.61%1.97%1.34%1.90%1.01%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWGAX and HLFMX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DWGAX has higher volatility (8.26%) compared to HLFMX (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWGAX dropped -38.71% vs HLFMX's -63.95%.

DWGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWGAX and HLFMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer