PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWAT vs. TACK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWAT vs. TACK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT) and Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DWAT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TACK

1D
0.13%
1M
1.95%
YTD
4.86%
6M
5.12%
1Y
13.26%
3Y*
11.07%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWAT vs. TACK - Yearly Performance Comparison


DWAT vs. TACK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWAT
TACK

Financial Services

27.2%

-

Industrials

25.1%
16.1%

Technology

10.2%
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
16.7%

Utilities

5.3%
16.8%

Healthcare

5.3%
16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
2.3%

Real Estate

5.1%

-

Energy

4.2%
16.4%

Communication Services

3.4%
12.2%

Basic Materials

2.6%
14.5%

Financial Services

DWAT
27.2%
TACK

-

Industrials

DWAT
25.1%
TACK
16.1%

Technology

DWAT
10.2%
TACK
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

DWAT
6.5%
TACK
16.7%

Utilities

DWAT
5.3%
TACK
16.8%

Healthcare

DWAT
5.3%
TACK
16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

DWAT
5.2%
TACK
2.3%

Real Estate

DWAT
5.1%
TACK

-

Energy

DWAT
4.2%
TACK
16.4%

Communication Services

DWAT
3.4%
TACK
12.2%

Basic Materials

DWAT
2.6%
TACK
14.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWAT vs. TACK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWAT

TACK
TACK Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
TACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
TACK Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
TACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
TACK Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWAT vs. TACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT) and Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DWAT vs. TACK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DWATTACKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

Drawdowns

DWAT vs. TACK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWAT drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum TACK drawdown of -14.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAT and TACK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWATTACKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-14.49%

+14.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.21%

+1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-4.23%

+4.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

Volatility

DWAT vs. TACK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWATTACKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

9.46%

-9.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

11.23%

-11.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

11.23%

-11.23%

DWAT vs. TACK - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWAT has a 1.83% expense ratio, which is higher than TACK's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWAT vs. TACK - Dividend Comparison

DWAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DWAT
Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TACK
Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund
1.21%1.18%1.26%1.29%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, TACK is cheaper at 0.76% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TACK is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 1.83% for DWAT.

TACK has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.00% for DWAT.

They also come from different issuers: Arrow Funds and Fairlead. Their fees differ too: 1.83% for DWAT and 0.76% for TACK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWAT and TACK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer