DWAFX vs. TTIFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Arrow DWA Tactical: Balanced Fund (DWAFX) and Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund (TTIFX).
DWAFX is managed by Arrow Funds. It was launched on Aug 6, 2006. TTIFX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jul 30, 2014.
Performance
DWAFX vs. TTIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DWAFX vs. TTIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAFX Arrow DWA Tactical: Balanced Fund | 4.68% | 15.86% | 5.79% | 1.26% | -5.30% | 4.68% | 21.10% | 10.89% | -10.01% | 10.61% |
TTIFX Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund | 0.19% | 6.79% | -2.91% | 6.04% | 0.93% | 8.25% | 5.13% | 4.99% | -2.45% | 0.84% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWAFX achieves a 4.68% return, which is significantly higher than TTIFX's 0.19% return.
DWAFX
- 1D
- 2.24%
- 1M
- -4.57%
- YTD
- 4.68%
- 6M
- 8.03%
- 1Y
- 21.07%
- 3Y*
- 9.84%
- 5Y*
- 4.58%
- 10Y*
- 5.82%
TTIFX
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- YTD
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 1.69%
- 1Y
- 5.26%
- 3Y*
- 2.64%
- 5Y*
- 2.79%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DWAFX vs. TTIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWAFX has a 1.84% expense ratio, which is higher than TTIFX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DWAFX vs. TTIFX — Risk / Return Rank
DWAFX
TTIFX
DWAFX vs. TTIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow DWA Tactical: Balanced Fund (DWAFX) and Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund (TTIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DWAFX | TTIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.59 | 1.32 | +0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.16 | 1.85 | +0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.33 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 1.91 | +0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.06 | 7.93 | +2.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DWAFX | TTIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | 1.32 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.48 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.51 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between DWAFX and TTIFX is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DWAFX vs. TTIFX - Dividend Comparison
DWAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.02%, more than TTIFX's 3.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAFX Arrow DWA Tactical: Balanced Fund | 12.02% | 12.58% | 0.13% | 4.45% | 6.02% | 4.94% | 11.89% | 2.07% | 9.09% | 7.24% | 0.00% | 5.70% |
TTIFX Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund | 3.00% | 3.01% | 0.00% | 5.33% | 0.84% | 2.02% | 4.71% | 1.09% | 0.00% | 0.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DWAFX vs. TTIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWAFX drawdown since its inception was -36.11%, which is greater than TTIFX's maximum drawdown of -13.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAFX and TTIFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWAFX | TTIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.11% | -13.21% | -22.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.13% | -2.66% | -6.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.26% | -9.04% | -5.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.72% | -1.73% | -2.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.15% | -2.15% | -5.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 0.64% | +1.48% |
Volatility
DWAFX vs. TTIFX - Volatility Comparison
Arrow DWA Tactical: Balanced Fund (DWAFX) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund (TTIFX) at 1.12%. This indicates that DWAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TTIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DWAFX | TTIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 1.12% | +3.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.80% | 1.84% | +7.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.55% | 4.40% | +9.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.96% | 5.91% | +5.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.89% | 5.93% | +3.96% |