DVXV vs. ARKG
DVXV (WEBs Health Care XLV Defined Volatility ETF) and ARKG (ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. DVXV is passively managed, while ARKG is actively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DVXV charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARKG.
Performance
DVXV vs. ARKG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVXV achieves a -1.82% return, which is significantly lower than ARKG's 24.30% return.
DVXV
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- 2.24%
- YTD
- -1.82%
- 6M
- -2.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKG
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 17.41%
- YTD
- 24.30%
- 6M
- 19.48%
- 1Y
- 52.71%
- 3Y*
- 3.17%
- 5Y*
- -16.56%
- 10Y*
- 8.67%
DVXV vs. ARKG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DVXV WEBs Health Care XLV Defined Volatility ETF | -1.82% | 21.27% |
ARKG ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF | 24.30% | 11.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVXV and ARKG is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVXV vs. ARKG — Risk / Return Rank
DVXV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ARKG
DVXV vs. ARKG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs Health Care XLV Defined Volatility ETF (DVXV) and ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DVXV | ARKG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.93 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.58 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DVXV vs. ARKG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVXV drawdown since its inception was -14.36%, smaller than the maximum ARKG drawdown of -83.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVXV and ARKG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVXV | ARKG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.36% | -83.59% | +69.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -27.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -51.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -80.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -83.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.49% | -67.78% | +61.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.87% | -36.02% | +31.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.53% | — |
Volatility
DVXV vs. ARKG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVXV | ARKG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 30.91% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.45% | 42.54% | -21.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.45% | 45.93% | -24.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.45% | 41.29% | -19.84% |
DVXV vs. ARKG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVXV has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than ARKG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVXV vs. ARKG - Dividend Comparison
Neither DVXV nor ARKG has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKG ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 0.85% | 3.14% | 0.82% | 1.34% |
DVXV WEBs Health Care XLV Defined Volatility ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DVXV and ARKG have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARKG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARKG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXV.
DVXV and ARKG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: WEBs and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for DVXV and 0.75% for ARKG.
Find the right allocation for DVXV and ARKG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer