DVSMX vs. DSMDX
DVSMX (Driehaus Small Cap Growth Fund) and DSMDX (Driehaus Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - DVSMX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Driehaus, while DSMDX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Driehaus. Over the past 5 years, DVSMX returned 8.73%/yr vs 9.02%/yr for DSMDX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DVSMX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for DSMDX.
Performance
DVSMX vs. DSMDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVSMX achieves a 19.46% return, which is significantly lower than DSMDX's 20.77% return.
DVSMX
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 19.46%
- 6M
- 19.00%
- 1Y
- 53.21%
- 3Y*
- 24.67%
- 5Y*
- 8.73%
- 10Y*
- —
DSMDX
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- 6.90%
- YTD
- 20.77%
- 6M
- 19.60%
- 1Y
- 42.62%
- 3Y*
- 22.95%
- 5Y*
- 9.02%
- 10Y*
- —
DVSMX vs. DSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVSMX Driehaus Small Cap Growth Fund | 19.46% | 16.66% | 27.44% | 18.93% | -34.12% | 18.41% | 89.04% |
DSMDX Driehaus Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund | 20.77% | 9.83% | 26.45% | 20.71% | -31.46% | 17.96% | 74.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVSMX and DSMDX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2020 | 0.98 |
The correlation between DVSMX and DSMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVSMX vs. DSMDX — Risk / Return Rank
DVSMX
DSMDX
DVSMX vs. DSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Driehaus Small Cap Growth Fund (DVSMX) and Driehaus Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (DSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DVSMX | DSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.31 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.63 | 3.07 | +0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.69 | 11.74 | +1.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DVSMX | DSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | 1.81 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.35 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.73 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
DVSMX vs. DSMDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVSMX drawdown since its inception was -47.64%, which is greater than DSMDX's maximum drawdown of -41.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVSMX and DSMDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVSMX | DSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.64% | -41.90% | -5.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.39% | -14.51% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.77% | -33.05% | -1.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.64% | -41.90% | -5.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -0.20% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.23% | -15.72% | -1.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.06% | 3.78% | +0.28% |
Volatility
DVSMX vs. DSMDX - Volatility Comparison
Driehaus Small Cap Growth Fund (DVSMX) and Driehaus Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (DSMDX) have volatilities of 8.45% and 8.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVSMX | DSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.45% | 8.55% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.94% | 19.78% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.39% | 24.62% | +0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.83% | 25.77% | +3.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.47% | 25.99% | +3.48% |
DVSMX vs. DSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVSMX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than DSMDX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVSMX vs. DSMDX - Dividend Comparison
DVSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than DSMDX's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSMDX Driehaus Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund | 0.34% | 0.41% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 3.72% | 7.93% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DVSMX Driehaus Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.18% | 0.21% | 1.08% | 0.38% | 2.15% | 17.58% | 6.55% | 6.34% | 2.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, DVSMX and DSMDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DSMDX has higher volatility (8.55%) compared to DVSMX (8.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVSMX dropped -47.64% vs DSMDX's -41.90%.
DVSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DVSMX and DSMDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer