DVSMX vs. CTSIX
DVSMX (Driehaus Small Cap Growth Fund) and CTSIX (Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, DVSMX returned 8.73%/yr vs 11.14%/yr for CTSIX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DVSMX charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for CTSIX.
Performance
DVSMX vs. CTSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVSMX achieves a 19.46% return, which is significantly lower than CTSIX's 35.59% return.
DVSMX
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 19.46%
- 6M
- 19.00%
- 1Y
- 53.21%
- 3Y*
- 24.67%
- 5Y*
- 8.73%
- 10Y*
- —
CTSIX
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- 11.15%
- YTD
- 35.59%
- 6M
- 35.33%
- 1Y
- 68.24%
- 3Y*
- 35.13%
- 5Y*
- 11.14%
- 10Y*
- —
DVSMX vs. CTSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVSMX Driehaus Small Cap Growth Fund | 19.46% | 16.66% | 27.44% | 18.93% | -34.12% | 18.41% | 63.95% | 7.90% |
CTSIX Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund | 35.59% | 25.90% | 44.34% | 7.57% | -37.30% | 9.12% | 63.38% | 1.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVSMX and CTSIX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2019 | 0.95 |
The correlation between DVSMX and CTSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVSMX vs. CTSIX — Risk / Return Rank
DVSMX
CTSIX
DVSMX vs. CTSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Driehaus Small Cap Growth Fund (DVSMX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DVSMX | CTSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.40 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.63 | 5.65 | -2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.69 | 23.22 | -9.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DVSMX | CTSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | 2.52 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.40 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.57 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
DVSMX vs. CTSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVSMX drawdown since its inception was -47.64%, smaller than the maximum CTSIX drawdown of -50.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVSMX and CTSIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVSMX | CTSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.64% | -50.83% | +3.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.39% | -12.38% | -3.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.77% | -28.40% | -6.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.64% | -50.60% | +2.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | 0.00% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.23% | -20.64% | +3.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.06% | 3.00% | +1.06% |
Volatility
DVSMX vs. CTSIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Driehaus Small Cap Growth Fund (DVSMX) is 8.45%, while Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX) has a volatility of 9.40%. This indicates that DVSMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVSMX | CTSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.45% | 9.40% | -0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.94% | 21.29% | -1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.39% | 27.70% | -2.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.83% | 28.00% | +0.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.47% | 29.78% | -0.31% |
DVSMX vs. CTSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVSMX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than CTSIX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVSMX vs. CTSIX - Dividend Comparison
DVSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, while CTSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTSIX Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.77% | 4.95% | 0.00% |
DVSMX Driehaus Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.18% | 0.21% | 1.08% | 0.38% | 2.15% | 17.58% | 6.55% | 6.34% | 2.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, DVSMX and CTSIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CTSIX has higher volatility (9.40%) compared to DVSMX (8.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVSMX dropped -47.64% vs CTSIX's -50.83%.
CTSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DVSMX and CTSIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer