PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DVRUX vs. PCMNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DVRUX vs. PCMNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS US Dividend Ruler Fund (DVRUX) and PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments (PCMNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVRUX achieves a 11.72% return, which is significantly higher than PCMNX's 1.20% return.


DVRUX

1D
1.22%
1M
4.84%
YTD
11.72%
6M
10.94%
1Y
24.66%
3Y*
19.58%
5Y*
12.85%
10Y*

PCMNX

1D
0.16%
1M
0.56%
YTD
1.20%
6M
1.60%
1Y
6.59%
3Y*
3.49%
5Y*
0.89%
10Y*
1.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DVRUX vs. PCMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DVRUX
UBS US Dividend Ruler Fund
11.72%16.53%20.96%13.56%-6.94%23.26%15.34%
PCMNX
PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments
1.20%4.52%0.85%5.54%-7.30%0.70%2.97%

Correlation

The correlation between DVRUX and PCMNX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2020

0.14

The correlation between DVRUX and PCMNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DVRUX vs. PCMNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVRUX
DVRUX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DVRUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVRUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVRUX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DVRUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVRUX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

PCMNX
PCMNX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PCMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
PCMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DVRUX vs. PCMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS US Dividend Ruler Fund (DVRUX) and PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments (PCMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DVRUXPCMNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.89

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

2.65

+0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.00

8.22

+4.78

DVRUX vs. PCMNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DVRUX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the PCMNX Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DVRUX and PCMNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DVRUXPCMNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

3.17

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.29

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

1.26

-0.18

Drawdowns

DVRUX vs. PCMNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVRUX drawdown since its inception was -19.06%, which is greater than PCMNX's maximum drawdown of -11.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVRUX and PCMNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DVRUXPCMNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.06%

-11.62%

-7.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.14%

-2.69%

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.13%

-4.41%

-11.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.06%

-11.62%

-7.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.94%

+0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-1.39%

-2.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

0.84%

+1.23%

Volatility

DVRUX vs. PCMNX - Volatility Comparison

UBS US Dividend Ruler Fund (DVRUX) has a higher volatility of 3.16% compared to PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments (PCMNX) at 0.80%. This indicates that DVRUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCMNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DVRUXPCMNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

0.80%

+2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.07%

1.67%

+7.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.20%

2.26%

+8.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.78%

3.07%

+11.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.71%

3.35%

+11.36%

DVRUX vs. PCMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVRUX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PCMNX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

DVRUX vs. PCMNX - Dividend Comparison

DVRUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%, more than PCMNX's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DVRUX
UBS US Dividend Ruler Fund
6.97%7.79%5.17%2.94%2.49%2.82%0.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PCMNX
PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments
2.82%2.49%2.58%2.37%2.30%2.38%2.47%3.41%3.11%2.89%3.33%3.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


DVRUX and PCMNX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DVRUX has higher volatility (3.16%) compared to PCMNX (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVRUX dropped -19.06% vs PCMNX's -11.62%.

PCMNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DVRUX and PCMNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer