PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DVND vs. LVDS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DVND vs. LVDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone Dividend Select ETF (DVND) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVND achieves a 10.56% return, which is significantly lower than LVDS's 14.33% return.


DVND

1D
0.43%
1M
3.87%
YTD
10.56%
6M
11.03%
1Y
24.15%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
10Y*

LVDS

1D
0.68%
1M
3.71%
YTD
14.33%
6M
15.43%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DVND vs. LVDS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DVND and LVDS is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025

0.91

DVND vs. LVDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DVND
LVDS

Technology

23.8%
15.9%

Financial Services

14.5%
18.3%

Healthcare

11.7%
8.6%

Industrials

9.5%
10.2%

Communication Services

9.3%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

8.3%
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
8.0%

Energy

5.0%
6.6%

Basic Materials

4.4%
1.7%

Utilities

3.3%
4.8%

Real Estate

2.4%
4.2%

Technology

DVND
23.8%
LVDS
15.9%

Financial Services

DVND
14.5%
LVDS
18.3%

Healthcare

DVND
11.7%
LVDS
8.6%

Industrials

DVND
9.5%
LVDS
10.2%

Communication Services

DVND
9.3%
LVDS
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

DVND
8.3%
LVDS
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

DVND
7.7%
LVDS
8.0%

Energy

DVND
5.0%
LVDS
6.6%

Basic Materials

DVND
4.4%
LVDS
1.7%

Utilities

DVND
3.3%
LVDS
4.8%

Real Estate

DVND
2.4%
LVDS
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DVND vs. LVDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVND
DVND Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
DVND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVND Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVND Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DVND Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVND Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

LVDS
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DVND vs. LVDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Dividend Select ETF (DVND) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DVNDLVDSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.77

DVND vs. LVDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DVNDLVDSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.06

2.47

-1.41

Drawdowns

DVND vs. LVDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVND drawdown since its inception was -14.83%, which is greater than LVDS's maximum drawdown of -6.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVND and LVDS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DVNDLVDSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.83%

-6.64%

-8.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.45%

-0.97%

-1.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

Volatility

DVND vs. LVDS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DVNDLVDSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.82%

10.42%

-0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.36%

10.42%

+2.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.36%

10.42%

+2.94%

DVND vs. LVDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVND has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than LVDS's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

DVND vs. LVDS - Dividend Comparison

DVND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than LVDS's 7.51% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DVND
Touchstone Dividend Select ETF
1.80%1.93%2.06%2.05%0.71%
LVDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF
7.51%8.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, DVND and LVDS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, LVDS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LVDS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for DVND.

LVDS has the higher dividend yield at 7.51%, compared with 1.80% for DVND.

They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for DVND and 0.30% for LVDS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DVND and LVDS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer