DVIN vs. RIFR
DVIN (WEBs Industrials XLI Defined Volatility ETF) and RIFR (Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds. DVIN is passively managed, while RIFR is actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DVIN charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for RIFR.
Performance
DVIN vs. RIFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVIN achieves a 15.30% return, which is significantly higher than RIFR's 8.62% return.
DVIN
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 2.41%
- YTD
- 15.30%
- 6M
- 16.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RIFR
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -1.89%
- YTD
- 8.62%
- 6M
- 8.08%
- 1Y
- 12.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DVIN vs. RIFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DVIN WEBs Industrials XLI Defined Volatility ETF | 15.30% | -1.06% |
RIFR Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF | 8.62% | 2.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVIN and RIFR is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVIN vs. RIFR — Risk / Return Rank
DVIN
RIFR
DVIN vs. RIFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs Industrials XLI Defined Volatility ETF (DVIN) and Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF (RIFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DVIN | RIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 1.47 | -0.82 |
Drawdowns
DVIN vs. RIFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVIN drawdown since its inception was -18.47%, which is greater than RIFR's maximum drawdown of -6.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVIN and RIFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVIN | RIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.47% | -6.80% | -11.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.59% | -4.18% | -3.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.00% | -1.61% | -3.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.12% | — |
Volatility
DVIN vs. RIFR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVIN | RIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.60% | 10.51% | +15.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.60% | 10.69% | +14.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.60% | 10.69% | +14.91% |
DVIN vs. RIFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVIN has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than RIFR's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVIN vs. RIFR - Dividend Comparison
DVIN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RIFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DVIN WEBs Industrials XLI Defined Volatility ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RIFR Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF | 0.90% | 0.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DVIN and RIFR have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RIFR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RIFR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVIN.
RIFR has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.00% for DVIN.
They also come from different issuers: WEBs and Russell. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for DVIN and 0.59% for RIFR.
Find the right allocation for DVIN and RIFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer