PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DV vs. TCEHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DV vs. TCEHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. (DV) and Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DV achieves a -1.66% return, which is significantly higher than TCEHY's -18.82% return.


DV

1D
1.90%
1M
-1.66%
6M
3.97%
YTD
-1.66%
1Y
-25.79%
3Y*
-32.08%
5Y*
-20.12%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-19.36%

TCEHY

1D
1.45%
1M
10.98%
6M
-18.65%
YTD
-18.82%
1Y
-8.49%
3Y*
11.92%
5Y*
2.48%
10Y*
11.45%
ALL TIME*
24.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$22.43M$23.73M$32.30M
$234.60M$228.99M$250.94M

DV vs. TCEHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DV
DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc.
-1.66%-40.45%-47.77%67.49%-34.01%-4.91%
TCEHY
Tencent Holdings Limited
-18.82%45.23%41.92%-5.48%-24.97%-25.63%

Correlation

The correlation between DV and TCEHY is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021

0.23

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DV:

$1.73B

TCEHY:

$553.66B

EPS

DV:

$0.33

TCEHY:

CN¥25.31

PE Ratio

DV:

34.09

TCEHY:

16.38

PEG Ratio

DV:

1.69

TCEHY:

2.04

PS Ratio

DV:

2.44

TCEHY:

5.01

PB Ratio

DV:

1.71

TCEHY:

3.39

Total Revenue (TTM)

DV:

$764.06M

TCEHY:

CN¥763.32B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DV:

$628.36M

TCEHY:

CN¥422.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

DV:

$148.67M

TCEHY:

CN¥324.78B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DV vs. TCEHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DV
DV Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
DV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
DV Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
DV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
DV Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

TCEHY
TCEHY Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
TCEHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCEHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCEHY Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
TCEHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCEHY Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DV vs. TCEHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. (DV) and Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DVTCEHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

0.97

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.57

-0.30

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.82

-0.53

-0.29

DV vs. TCEHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DV Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is lower than the TCEHY Sharpe Ratio of -0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DV and TCEHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DV vs. TCEHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DV drawdown since its inception was -81.70%, which is greater than TCEHY's maximum drawdown of -73.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DV and TCEHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DVTCEHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.70%

-73.17%

-8.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.08%

-38.23%

-8.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-79.74%

-38.23%

-41.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-79.74%

-60.48%

-19.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.09%

-30.01%

-46.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.72%

-19.83%

-28.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.45%

21.22%

+11.23%

Volatility

DV vs. TCEHY - Volatility Comparison

DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. (DV) and Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY) have volatilities of 12.86% and 13.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DVTCEHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.86%

13.24%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.91%

27.31%

+7.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.72%

33.66%

+12.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.86%

43.15%

+8.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.97%

39.01%

+13.96%

Dividends

DV vs. TCEHY - Dividend Comparison

DV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TCEHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DV
DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TCEHY
Tencent Holdings Limited
1.10%0.76%0.82%6.67%4.15%0.35%0.19%0.23%0.26%0.29%0.51%0.21%

Financials

DV vs. TCEHY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. and Tencent Holdings Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

DV vs. TCEHY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. and Tencent Holdings Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

DV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 147.67M and revenue of 180.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.7%.

TCEHY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tencent Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 106.58B and revenue of 195.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.6%.

DV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 15.64M and revenue of 180.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.7%.

TCEHY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tencent Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 65.72B and revenue of 195.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.7%.

DV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 6.41M and revenue of 180.83M, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.

TCEHY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tencent Holdings Limited reported a net income of 57.74B and revenue of 195.27B, resulting in a net margin of 29.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DV and TCEHY have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TCEHY has higher volatility (13.24%) compared to DV (12.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DV dropped -81.70% vs TCEHY's -73.17%.

TCEHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.34 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DV and TCEHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer