DV.V vs. ASM.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Dolly Varden Silver Corp (DV.V) and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM.TO).
Performance
DV.V vs. ASM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DV.V vs. ASM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DV.V Dolly Varden Silver Corp | -38.00% | 56.25% | 10.34% | -3.33% | 42.86% | -31.52% | 187.50% | -34.69% | -30.99% | 18.33% |
ASM.TO Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. | 3.40% | 577.78% | 82.61% | -25.00% | -17.12% | -32.73% | 120.00% | -10.71% | -51.16% | -6.01% |
Fundamentals
DV.V:
CA$326.52M
ASM.TO:
CA$1.45B
DV.V:
-CA$0.37
ASM.TO:
CA$0.17
DV.V:
2.47
ASM.TO:
6.21
DV.V:
CA$0.00
ASM.TO:
CA$88.12M
DV.V:
-CA$36.56K
ASM.TO:
CA$44.14M
DV.V:
-CA$34.14M
ASM.TO:
CA$39.90M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DV.V achieves a -38.00% return, which is significantly lower than ASM.TO's 3.40% return. Over the past 10 years, DV.V has underperformed ASM.TO with an annualized return of 18.52%, while ASM.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 21.02% annualized return.
DV.V
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- -45.77%
- YTD
- -38.00%
- 6M
- -46.78%
- 1Y
- -10.58%
- 3Y*
- -1.39%
- 5Y*
- 7.43%
- 10Y*
- 18.52%
ASM.TO
- 1D
- 9.01%
- 1M
- -32.70%
- YTD
- 3.40%
- 6M
- 20.96%
- 1Y
- 233.21%
- 3Y*
- 93.97%
- 5Y*
- 40.90%
- 10Y*
- 21.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DV.V vs. ASM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DV.V
ASM.TO
DV.V vs. ASM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dolly Varden Silver Corp (DV.V) and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DV.V | ASM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | 2.85 | -3.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.14 | 2.96 | -2.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.38 | -0.36 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 4.36 | -4.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | 13.29 | -13.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DV.V | ASM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 | 2.85 | -3.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.62 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.30 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 0.03 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between DV.V and ASM.TO is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DV.V vs. ASM.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither DV.V nor ASM.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
DV.V vs. ASM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DV.V drawdown since its inception was -97.76%, roughly equal to the maximum ASM.TO drawdown of -95.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DV.V and ASM.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DV.V | ASM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.76% | -95.61% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.43% | -52.03% | -0.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.09% | -65.29% | +6.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.08% | -89.69% | +7.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.02% | -42.14% | -38.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.06% | -65.31% | -16.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.35% | 17.09% | -0.74% |
Volatility
DV.V vs. ASM.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dolly Varden Silver Corp (DV.V) is 18.86%, while Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM.TO) has a volatility of 27.97%. This indicates that DV.V experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DV.V | ASM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.86% | 27.97% | -9.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.99% | 67.11% | -16.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.71% | 82.43% | -16.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.50% | 66.11% | +5.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.90% | 69.69% | +13.21% |
Financials
DV.V vs. ASM.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dolly Varden Silver Corp and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities