PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DUSQX vs. FSKAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DUSQX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA U.S. Large Cap Equity Portfolio (DUSQX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DUSQX having a 11.64% return and FSKAX slightly higher at 12.08%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DUSQX having a 15.03% annualized return and FSKAX not far ahead at 15.09%.


DUSQX

1D
0.29%
1M
5.48%
YTD
11.64%
6M
11.76%
1Y
28.24%
3Y*
22.24%
5Y*
13.04%
10Y*
15.03%

FSKAX

1D
0.24%
1M
5.80%
YTD
12.08%
6M
11.98%
1Y
29.13%
3Y*
22.42%
5Y*
13.08%
10Y*
15.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUSQX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DUSQX
DFA U.S. Large Cap Equity Portfolio
11.64%16.76%24.25%24.23%-16.85%24.31%18.89%31.52%-6.22%22.09%
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
12.08%17.06%23.89%26.12%-19.53%25.66%20.79%30.92%-5.32%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between DUSQX and FSKAX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.99

The correlation between DUSQX and FSKAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DUSQX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUSQX
DUSQX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
DUSQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUSQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUSQX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
DUSQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUSQX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

FSKAX
FSKAX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FSKAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSKAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSKAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FSKAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSKAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUSQX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Large Cap Equity Portfolio (DUSQX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DUSQXFSKAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.64

2.46

+0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.66

3.35

+0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.44

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

3.38

+0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.60

15.52

+1.08

DUSQX vs. FSKAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUSQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is comparable to the FSKAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUSQX and FSKAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DUSQXFSKAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

2.46

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.76

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.82

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.85

-0.07

Drawdowns

DUSQX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUSQX drawdown since its inception was -34.83%, roughly equal to the maximum FSKAX drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUSQX and FSKAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DUSQXFSKAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.83%

-35.01%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.32%

-8.92%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.00%

-19.43%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.05%

-25.39%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.83%

-35.01%

+0.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.14%

-4.02%

-0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

1.94%

-0.18%

Volatility

DUSQX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA U.S. Large Cap Equity Portfolio (DUSQX) is 2.62%, while Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that DUSQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DUSQXFSKAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

2.97%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.64%

9.23%

-0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.14%

12.26%

-1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.67%

17.41%

-0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.68%

18.46%

-0.78%

DUSQX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUSQX has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DUSQX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison

DUSQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than FSKAX's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DUSQX
DFA U.S. Large Cap Equity Portfolio
0.91%0.98%1.11%4.95%4.84%2.45%1.42%1.65%1.79%1.62%1.80%1.75%
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
0.93%1.01%1.19%1.41%1.62%1.15%1.45%1.94%2.54%2.07%2.43%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, DUSQX and FSKAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSKAX has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to DUSQX (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUSQX dropped -34.83% vs FSKAX's -35.01%.

DUSQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DUSQX and FSKAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer