DUOL vs. IBTH
DUOL (Duolingo, Inc.) is a stock, while IBTH (iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Treasury Index. Over the past 3 years, DUOL returned -11.69%/yr vs 3.92%/yr for IBTH. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DUOL vs. IBTH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUOL achieves a -38.80% return, which is significantly lower than IBTH's 0.92% return.
DUOL
- 1D
- -2.32%
- 1M
- -2.57%
- YTD
- -38.80%
- 6M
- -42.05%
- 1Y
- -79.08%
- 3Y*
- -11.69%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBTH
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 0.92%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- 3.93%
- 3Y*
- 3.92%
- 5Y*
- 0.47%
- 10Y*
- —
DUOL vs. IBTH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUOL Duolingo, Inc. | -38.80% | -45.87% | 42.93% | 218.92% | -32.97% | -23.67% |
IBTH iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF | 0.92% | 5.29% | 3.22% | 4.38% | -9.75% | -2.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUOL and IBTH is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2021 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUOL vs. IBTH — Risk / Return Rank
DUOL
IBTH
DUOL vs. IBTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) and iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF (IBTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DUOL | IBTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -9.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.68 | 1.93 | -1.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | 10.34 | -11.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | 40.10 | -41.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DUOL | IBTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.27 | 3.57 | -4.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.08 | 0.15 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
DUOL vs. IBTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUOL drawdown since its inception was -83.35%, which is greater than IBTH's maximum drawdown of -16.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUOL and IBTH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUOL | IBTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.35% | -16.16% | -67.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -82.79% | -0.38% | -82.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -83.35% | -2.10% | -81.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.14% | -1.36% | -78.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.54% | -6.72% | -28.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 60.80% | 0.10% | +60.70% |
Volatility
DUOL vs. IBTH - Volatility Comparison
Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) has a higher volatility of 17.63% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF (IBTH) at 0.18%. This indicates that DUOL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUOL | IBTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.63% | 0.18% | +17.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.01% | 0.54% | +40.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.36% | 1.11% | +61.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.29% | 4.20% | +62.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.29% | 4.21% | +62.08% |
Dividends
DUOL vs. IBTH - Dividend Comparison
DUOL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUOL Duolingo, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBTH iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF | 3.83% | 3.92% | 4.04% | 3.61% | 2.00% | 0.77% | 0.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUOL and IBTH have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DUOL has higher volatility (17.63%) compared to IBTH (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUOL dropped -83.35% vs IBTH's -16.16%.
IBTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.57 vs -1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DUOL and IBTH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer