PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DUKZ vs. PFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DUKZ vs. PFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF (DUKZ) and Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUKZ achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly lower than PFIX's 11.17% return.


DUKZ

1D
0.39%
1M
-0.72%
6M
0.81%
YTD
1.77%
1Y
4.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.18%

PFIX

1D
0.46%
1M
18.26%
6M
11.37%
YTD
11.17%
1Y
7.75%
3Y*
14.25%
5Y*
23.80%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$208.39K$469.42K$590.33K
$8.65M$6.17M$16.90M

DUKZ vs. PFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DUKZ
Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF
1.77%4.24%2.55%
PFIX
Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF
11.17%0.42%10.00%

Correlation

The correlation between DUKZ and PFIX is -0.50, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024

-0.55

The correlation between DUKZ and PFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.55 to -0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DUKZ vs. PFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DUKZ
DUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
DUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
DUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

PFIX
PFIX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
PFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
PFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DUKZ vs. PFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF (DUKZ) and Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DUKZPFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.07

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

0.33

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.95

0.50

+4.45

DUKZ vs. PFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUKZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is higher than the PFIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUKZ and PFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DUKZ vs. PFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUKZ drawdown since its inception was -4.70%, smaller than the maximum PFIX drawdown of -36.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUKZ and PFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DUKZPFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.70%

-36.17%

+31.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.39%

-23.71%

+20.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

-8.34%

+6.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.12%

-17.19%

+16.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

15.40%

-14.39%

Volatility

DUKZ vs. PFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF (DUKZ) is 1.05%, while Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX) has a volatility of 7.75%. This indicates that DUKZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DUKZPFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

7.75%

-6.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.08%

21.85%

-17.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.65%

28.94%

-24.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.38%

38.62%

-34.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.38%

38.12%

-33.74%

DUKZ vs. PFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUKZ has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than PFIX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DUKZ vs. PFIX - Dividend Comparison

DUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, less than PFIX's 7.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DUKZ
Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF
3.89%4.05%2.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PFIX
Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF
7.78%9.92%3.40%87.92%0.63%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DUKZ and PFIX have a correlation of -0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFIX has higher volatility (7.75%) compared to DUKZ (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUKZ dropped -4.70% vs PFIX's -36.17%.

On 1-year performance, PFIX leads with 7.75% vs 4.99% for DUKZ. On fees, PFIX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DUKZ has been the lower-risk option at 1.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PFIX has performed better with a 7.75% return vs 4.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PFIX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for DUKZ.

PFIX has the higher dividend yield at 7.78%, compared with 3.89% for DUKZ.

DUKZ is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while PFIX is Inverse Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Ocean Park and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for DUKZ and 0.50% for PFIX.

DUKZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DUKZ and PFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer