DUKZ vs. JFLX
DUKZ (Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF) and JFLX (JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DUKZ charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for JFLX.
Performance
DUKZ vs. JFLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUKZ achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly lower than JFLX's 2.20% return.
DUKZ
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -0.72%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 4.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.18%
JFLX
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $208.39K | $469.42K | $590.33K | |
| $5.28M | $5.17M | $5.16M |
DUKZ vs. JFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DUKZ Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF | 1.77% | 0.81% |
JFLX JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF | 2.20% | 1.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUKZ and JFLX is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUKZ vs. JFLX — Risk / Return Rank
DUKZ
JFLX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DUKZ vs. JFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF (DUKZ) and JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF (JFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DUKZ | JFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.95 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DUKZ vs. JFLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUKZ drawdown since its inception was -4.70%, which is greater than JFLX's maximum drawdown of -2.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUKZ and JFLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUKZ | JFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.70% | -2.36% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.38% | -0.20% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.12% | -0.38% | -0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | — | — |
Volatility
DUKZ vs. JFLX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUKZ | JFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.05% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.08% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.65% | 2.61% | +2.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.38% | 2.61% | +1.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.38% | 2.61% | +1.77% |
DUKZ vs. JFLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUKZ has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than JFLX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUKZ vs. JFLX - Dividend Comparison
DUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, less than JFLX's 3.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DUKZ Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF | 3.89% | 4.05% | 2.44% |
JFLX JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF | 3.98% | 1.27% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUKZ and JFLX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JFLX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JFLX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for DUKZ.
JFLX has the higher dividend yield at 3.98%, compared with 3.89% for DUKZ.
They also come from different issuers: Ocean Park and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for DUKZ and 0.45% for JFLX.
Find the right allocation for DUKZ and JFLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer