DUKH vs. BBHY

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DUKH (Ocean Park High Income ETF) and BBHY (JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. DUKH is actively managed, while BBHY is passively managed. Over the past year, DUKH returned 5.48% vs 7.10% for BBHY. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DUKH charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BBHY.

Performance

DUKH vs. BBHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ocean Park High Income ETF (DUKH) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUKH achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly lower than BBHY's 1.73% return.

DUKH

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.32%
• YTD: 0.46%
• 6M: 0.78%
• 1Y: 5.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BBHY

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 1.73%
• 6M: 2.18%
• 1Y: 7.10%
• 3Y*: 8.76%
• 5Y*: 4.12%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUKH vs. BBHY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DUKH Ocean Park High Income ETF	0.46%	2.85%	2.79%
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	1.73%	8.51%	3.98%

Correlation

The correlation between DUKH and BBHY is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2024	0.87

The correlation between DUKH and BBHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

DUKH vs. BBHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DUKH	BBHY
Utilities	89.7%	2.0%
Healthcare	13.8%	5.4%
Technology	10.3%	4.0%
Basic Materials	-	3.2%
Communication Services	-	7.9%
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.5%
Energy	-	5.2%
Financial Services	-	4.1%
Industrials	-	8.4%
Real Estate	-	3.9%

Return for Risk

DUKH vs. BBHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUKH

DUKH Risk / Return Rank: 45
DUKH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
DUKH Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
DUKH Omega Ratio Rank: 48
DUKH Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
DUKH Martin Ratio Rank: 41

BBHY

BBHY Risk / Return Rank: 65
BBHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
BBHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
BBHY Omega Ratio Rank: 65
BBHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
BBHY Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUKH vs. BBHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ocean Park High Income ETF (DUKH) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DUKH	BBHY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	1.97	-0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.38	2.99	-0.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.39	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	3.00	-1.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.33	13.50	-7.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DUKH vs. BBHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUKH Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the BBHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUKH and BBHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DUKH	BBHY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.61	1.97	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.57	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	0.64	+0.22

Drawdowns

DUKH vs. BBHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUKH drawdown since its inception was -5.70%, smaller than the maximum BBHY drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUKH and BBHY.

Drawdown Indicators

	DUKH	BBHY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.70%	-24.98%	+19.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.06%	-2.37%	-0.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.00%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.81%	-0.14%	-0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.13%	-2.37%	+1.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.87%	0.53%	+0.34%

Volatility

DUKH vs. BBHY - Volatility Comparison

Ocean Park High Income ETF (DUKH) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) at 1.13%. This indicates that DUKH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DUKH	BBHY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.22%	1.13%	+0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.75%	2.85%	-0.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.42%	3.62%	-0.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.77%	7.26%	-3.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.77%	7.53%	-3.76%

DUKH vs. BBHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUKH has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BBHY's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

DUKH vs. BBHY - Dividend Comparison

DUKH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.13%, less than BBHY's 6.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	6.94%	7.24%	7.18%	6.49%	5.92%	4.06%	4.73%	4.99%	5.02%	4.81%	1.42%
DUKH Ocean Park High Income ETF	6.13%	6.12%	2.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DUKH and BBHY in my portfolio?

DUKH and BBHY have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DUKH or BBHY?

DUKH has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to BBHY (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUKH dropped -5.70% vs BBHY's -24.98%.

Which ETF is better, DUKH or BBHY?

On 1-year performance, BBHY leads with 7.10% vs 5.48% for DUKH. On fees, BBHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DUKH or BBHY?

Over the 1-year period, BBHY has performed better with a 7.10% return vs 5.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DUKH or BBHY?

BBHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for DUKH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DUKH or BBHY?

BBHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.94%, compared with 6.13% for DUKH.

What is the main difference between DUKH and BBHY?

They also come from different issuers: Ocean Park and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for DUKH and 0.15% for BBHY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.