DUG vs. TSMX
DUG (ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas) and TSMX (Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. DUG is passively managed, while TSMX is actively managed. Over the past year, DUG returned -52.73% vs 129.25% for TSMX. Their -0.01 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. DUG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for TSMX.
Performance
DUG vs. TSMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUG achieves a -47.25% return, which is significantly lower than TSMX's 48.80% return.
DUG
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- -20.41%
- 6M
- -30.77%
- YTD
- -47.25%
- 1Y
- -52.73%
- 3Y*
- -25.03%
- 5Y*
- -40.83%
- 10Y*
- -32.74%
- ALL TIME*
- -30.09%
TSMX
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -15.56%
- 6M
- 28.30%
- YTD
- 48.80%
- 1Y
- 129.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 87.80%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.33M | $1.11M | $2.13M | |
| $51.36M | $73.43M | $83.39M |
DUG vs. TSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DUG ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas | -47.25% | -18.63% | 11.22% |
TSMX Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X ETF | 48.80% | 81.48% | 16.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUG and TSMX is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024 | -0.01 |
The correlation between DUG and TSMX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DUG vs. TSMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DUG
TSMX
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
DUG
TSMX
-
Basic Materials
DUG
-
TSMX
-
Communication Services
DUG
-
TSMX
-
Consumer Cyclical
DUG
-
TSMX
-
Consumer Defensive
DUG
-
TSMX
-
Energy
DUG
-
TSMX
-
Healthcare
DUG
-
TSMX
-
Industrials
DUG
-
TSMX
-
Real Estate
DUG
-
TSMX
-
Technology
DUG
-
TSMX
Utilities
DUG
-
TSMX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUG vs. TSMX — Risk / Return Rank
DUG
TSMX
DUG vs. TSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas (DUG) and Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X ETF (TSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DUG | TSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.25 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | 2.93 | -3.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | 8.89 | -10.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DUG vs. TSMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUG drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than TSMX's maximum drawdown of -63.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUG and TSMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUG | TSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -63.80% | -36.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.00% | -39.94% | -17.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.92% | -30.40% | -69.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.04% | -15.95% | -73.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.55% | 13.13% | +22.42% |
Volatility
DUG vs. TSMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas (DUG) is 12.01%, while Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X ETF (TSMX) has a volatility of 27.37%. This indicates that DUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUG | TSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.01% | 27.37% | -15.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.36% | 66.13% | -32.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.16% | 81.69% | -39.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.13% | 84.12% | -32.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.79% | 84.12% | -25.33% |
DUG vs. TSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TSMX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUG vs. TSMX - Dividend Comparison
DUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, less than TSMX's 5.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUG ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas | 4.54% | 3.21% | 5.66% | 4.16% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 0.56% | 0.29% |
TSMX Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X ETF | 5.70% | 8.01% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUG and TSMX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSMX has higher volatility (27.37%) compared to DUG (12.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUG dropped -99.92% vs TSMX's -63.80%.
On 1-year performance, TSMX leads with 129.25% vs -52.73% for DUG. On fees, DUG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, DUG has been the lower-risk option at 12.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSMX has performed better with a 129.25% return vs -52.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DUG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSMX.
TSMX has the higher dividend yield at 5.70%, compared with 4.54% for DUG.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DUG and 0.99% for TSMX.
TSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DUG and TSMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer