DUG vs. TSMG
DUG (ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas) and TSMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. DUG is passively managed, while TSMG is actively managed. Over the past year, DUG returned -55.13% vs 292.24% for TSMG. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. DUG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TSMG.
Performance
DUG vs. TSMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUG achieves a -44.73% return, which is significantly lower than TSMG's 92.52% return.
DUG
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- YTD
- -44.73%
- 6M
- -42.13%
- 1Y
- -55.13%
- 3Y*
- -28.78%
- 5Y*
- -38.28%
- 10Y*
- -32.12%
TSMG
- 1D
- 3.47%
- 1M
- 24.82%
- YTD
- 92.52%
- 6M
- 104.85%
- 1Y
- 292.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DUG vs. TSMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DUG ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas | -44.73% | -7.75% |
TSMG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF | 92.52% | 76.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUG and TSMG is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025 | -0.04 |
The correlation between DUG and TSMG shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.10 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUG vs. TSMG — Risk / Return Rank
DUG
TSMG
DUG vs. TSMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas (DUG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DUG | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 1.45 | -0.70 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | 8.34 | -9.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.64 | 27.23 | -28.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DUG | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.36 | 4.11 | -5.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.51 | 1.76 | -2.27 |
Drawdowns
DUG vs. TSMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUG drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than TSMG's maximum drawdown of -63.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUG and TSMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUG | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -63.67% | -36.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.89% | -35.29% | -24.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.92% | -0.93% | -98.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.97% | -16.94% | -72.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.57% | 10.79% | +22.78% |
Volatility
DUG vs. TSMG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas (DUG) is 16.20%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG) has a volatility of 22.71%. This indicates that DUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUG | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.20% | 22.71% | -6.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.83% | 55.10% | -22.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.86% | 71.76% | -30.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.59% | 80.99% | -29.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.80% | 80.99% | -22.19% |
DUG vs. TSMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TSMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUG vs. TSMG - Dividend Comparison
DUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, less than TSMG's 5.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUG ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas | 4.99% | 3.21% | 5.66% | 4.16% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 0.56% | 0.29% |
TSMG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF | 5.96% | 11.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUG and TSMG have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSMG has higher volatility (22.71%) compared to DUG (16.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUG dropped -99.92% vs TSMG's -63.67%.
On 1-year performance, TSMG leads with 292.24% vs -55.13% for DUG. On fees, TSMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DUG has been the lower-risk option at 16.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSMG has performed better with a 292.24% return vs -55.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DUG.
TSMG has the higher dividend yield at 5.96%, compared with 4.99% for DUG.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DUG and 0.75% for TSMG.
TSMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.11 vs -1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DUG and TSMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer