DUG vs. NBET

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DUG (ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas) and NBET (Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DUG is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the DJ Global United States (All) / Oil & Gas -IND (-200%), while NBET is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Neuberger Berman. DUG is passively managed, while NBET is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DUG returned -26.36%/yr vs 19.86%/yr for NBET. At a correlation of -0.57, they often move in opposite directions. DUG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for NBET.

Performance

DUG vs. NBET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas (DUG) and Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF (NBET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUG achieves a -36.75% return, which is significantly lower than NBET's 20.80% return.

DUG

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: 16.78%
• YTD: -36.75%
• 6M: -37.18%
• 1Y: -42.58%
• 3Y*: -26.36%
• 5Y*: -36.37%
• 10Y*: -31.35%

NBET

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: -5.87%
• YTD: 20.80%
• 6M: 20.90%
• 1Y: 23.09%
• 3Y*: 19.86%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUG vs. NBET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DUG ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas	-36.75%	-18.63%	-6.13%	-2.28%	-44.97%
NBET Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF	20.80%	5.87%	30.30%	7.48%	-6.07%

Correlation

The correlation between DUG and NBET is -0.81, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2022	-0.57

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between DUG and NBET has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.57 to -0.81, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

DUG vs. NBET - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DUG	NBET
Financial Services	33.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	0.9%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	88.7%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	2.3%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	9.0%

Return for Risk

DUG vs. NBET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUG

DUG Risk / Return Rank: 2
DUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
DUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
DUG Omega Ratio Rank: 2
DUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
DUG Martin Ratio Rank: 2

NBET

NBET Risk / Return Rank: 51
NBET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
NBET Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
NBET Omega Ratio Rank: 44
NBET Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
NBET Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUG vs. NBET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas (DUG) and Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF (NBET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DUG	NBET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.03	1.59	-2.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.59	2.15	-3.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	1.26	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.75	2.90	-3.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.34	7.90	-9.24

DUG vs. NBET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUG Sharpe Ratio is -1.03, which is lower than the NBET Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUG and NBET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DUG vs. NBET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUG drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than NBET's maximum drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUG and NBET.

Drawdown Indicators

	DUG	NBET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.92%	-18.72%	-81.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.00%	-8.00%	-49.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-68.64%	-18.72%	-49.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-94.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.90%	-6.98%	-92.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.98%	-5.07%	-83.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.81%	2.93%	+28.88%

Volatility

DUG vs. NBET - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas (DUG) has a higher volatility of 14.09% compared to Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF (NBET) at 4.77%. This indicates that DUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NBET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DUG	NBET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.09%	4.77%	+9.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.47%	11.00%	+22.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.82%	14.66%	+27.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.52%	19.48%	+32.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.84%	19.48%	+39.36%

DUG vs. NBET - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NBET's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

DUG vs. NBET - Dividend Comparison

DUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than NBET's 1.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DUG ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas	4.36%	3.21%	5.66%	4.16%	0.28%	0.00%	0.10%	0.56%	0.29%
NBET Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF	1.71%	2.70%	2.43%	1.22%	0.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DUG and NBET in my portfolio?

DUG and NBET have a correlation of -0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DUG or NBET?

DUG has higher volatility (14.09%) compared to NBET (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUG dropped -99.92% vs NBET's -18.72%.

Which ETF is better, DUG or NBET?

On 3-year performance, NBET leads with 19.86% vs -26.36% for DUG. On fees, NBET is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, NBET has been the lower-risk option at 4.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DUG or NBET?

Over the 3-year period, NBET has performed better with a 19.86% return vs -26.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DUG or NBET?

NBET is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DUG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DUG or NBET?

DUG has the higher dividend yield at 4.36%, compared with 1.71% for NBET.

What is the main difference between DUG and NBET?

DUG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NBET is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Neuberger Berman. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DUG and 0.65% for NBET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NBET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.