PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DTLGX vs. PROVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DTLGX vs. PROVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wilshire Large Company Growth Portfolio (DTLGX) and Provident Trust Strategy Fund (PROVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTLGX achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly higher than PROVX's 3.18% return. Over the past 10 years, DTLGX has outperformed PROVX with an annualized return of 17.00%, while PROVX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.83% annualized return.


DTLGX

1D
0.86%
1M
7.27%
YTD
10.26%
6M
9.41%
1Y
31.40%
3Y*
27.87%
5Y*
14.73%
10Y*
17.00%

PROVX

1D
-0.51%
1M
-1.77%
YTD
3.18%
6M
4.20%
1Y
19.38%
3Y*
16.34%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
12.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DTLGX vs. PROVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DTLGX
Wilshire Large Company Growth Portfolio
10.26%21.95%35.90%39.81%-31.60%22.61%38.78%28.64%-2.20%27.03%
PROVX
Provident Trust Strategy Fund
3.18%13.10%19.73%17.59%-22.62%31.96%19.47%25.71%-1.31%29.40%

Correlation

The correlation between DTLGX and PROVX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 1992

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between DTLGX and PROVX has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DTLGX vs. PROVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTLGX
DTLGX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
DTLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
DTLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

PROVX
PROVX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
PROVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PROVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PROVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
PROVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
PROVX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DTLGX vs. PROVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilshire Large Company Growth Portfolio (DTLGX) and Provident Trust Strategy Fund (PROVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DTLGXPROVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.93

1.57

+0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.58

2.48

+0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.29

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

1.55

+0.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.62

5.55

+1.08

DTLGX vs. PROVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTLGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the PROVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTLGX and PROVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DTLGXPROVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

1.57

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.48

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.80

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.50

+0.05

Drawdowns

DTLGX vs. PROVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTLGX drawdown since its inception was -56.57%, roughly equal to the maximum PROVX drawdown of -57.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTLGX and PROVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DTLGXPROVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.57%

-57.65%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.05%

-12.54%

-4.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.20%

-15.92%

-8.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.84%

-27.48%

-8.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.84%

-27.48%

-8.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.26%

+2.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.87%

-13.19%

-0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.91%

3.51%

+1.40%

Volatility

DTLGX vs. PROVX - Volatility Comparison

Wilshire Large Company Growth Portfolio (DTLGX) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to Provident Trust Strategy Fund (PROVX) at 2.44%. This indicates that DTLGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PROVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DTLGXPROVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

2.44%

+1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.77%

9.47%

+3.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.96%

12.22%

+4.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.05%

15.66%

+6.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.30%

16.18%

+5.12%

DTLGX vs. PROVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTLGX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than PROVX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

DTLGX vs. PROVX - Dividend Comparison

DTLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.50%, more than PROVX's 16.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DTLGX
Wilshire Large Company Growth Portfolio
23.50%25.91%13.48%0.09%20.78%22.68%21.08%10.06%16.96%9.01%12.35%11.48%
PROVX
Provident Trust Strategy Fund
16.28%16.80%6.94%4.61%19.17%0.35%9.04%4.40%5.80%1.54%1.92%7.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


DTLGX and PROVX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DTLGX has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to PROVX (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTLGX dropped -56.57% vs PROVX's -57.65%.

DTLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DTLGX and PROVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer