DTLGX vs. FDSSX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

DTLGX (Wilshire Large Company Growth Portfolio) and FDSSX (Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, DTLGX returned 15.63%/yr vs 14.84%/yr for FDSSX. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DTLGX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for FDSSX.

Performance

DTLGX vs. FDSSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wilshire Large Company Growth Portfolio (DTLGX) and Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund (FDSSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTLGX achieves a 2.54% return, which is significantly lower than FDSSX's 14.50% return. Over the past 10 years, DTLGX has outperformed FDSSX with an annualized return of 15.63%, while FDSSX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.84% annualized return.

DTLGX

• 1D: 3.27%
• 1M: -2.78%
• 6M: 3.90%
• YTD: 2.54%
• 1Y: 13.02%
• 3Y*: 21.92%
• 5Y*: 11.41%
• 10Y*: 15.63%
• ALL TIME*: 10.77%

FDSSX

• 1D: 1.87%
• 1M: -0.79%
• 6M: 11.52%
• YTD: 14.50%
• 1Y: 28.35%
• 3Y*: 19.68%
• 5Y*: 12.00%
• 10Y*: 14.84%
• ALL TIME*: 11.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DTLGX Wilshire Large Company Growth Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FDSSX Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

DTLGX vs. FDSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DTLGX Wilshire Large Company Growth Portfolio	2.54%	21.95%	35.90%	39.81%	-31.60%	22.61%	38.78%	28.64%	-2.20%	27.03%
FDSSX Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund	14.50%	18.89%	19.79%	26.94%	-19.55%	23.14%	24.90%	32.21%	-8.61%	24.42%

Correlation

The correlation between DTLGX and FDSSX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 1992	0.92

The correlation between DTLGX and FDSSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DTLGX vs. FDSSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DTLGX

DTLGX Risk / Return Rank: 15
DTLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
DTLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
DTLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
DTLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
DTLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

FDSSX

FDSSX Risk / Return Rank: 80
FDSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
FDSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FDSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
FDSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FDSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DTLGX vs. FDSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilshire Large Company Growth Portfolio (DTLGX) and Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund (FDSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DTLGX	FDSSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	1.82	-1.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.95	2.50	-1.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.33	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.66	2.83	-2.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.13	12.79	-10.66

DTLGX vs. FDSSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTLGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the FDSSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTLGX and FDSSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DTLGX vs. FDSSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTLGX drawdown since its inception was -56.57%, roughly equal to the maximum FDSSX drawdown of -56.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTLGX and FDSSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DTLGX	FDSSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.57%	-56.77%	+0.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.05%	-9.19%	-7.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.20%	-20.86%	-3.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.84%	-25.22%	-10.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.84%	-34.37%	-1.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.00%	-2.29%	-4.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.82%	-9.85%	-3.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.31%	2.03%	+3.28%

Volatility

DTLGX vs. FDSSX - Volatility Comparison

Wilshire Large Company Growth Portfolio (DTLGX) has a higher volatility of 6.17% compared to Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund (FDSSX) at 3.73%. This indicates that DTLGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DTLGX	FDSSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.17%	3.73%	+2.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.97%	11.38%	+3.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.86%	14.26%	+4.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.38%	17.90%	+4.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.43%	18.58%	+2.85%

DTLGX vs. FDSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTLGX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FDSSX's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

DTLGX vs. FDSSX - Dividend Comparison

DTLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.27%, more than FDSSX's 4.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DTLGX Wilshire Large Company Growth Portfolio	25.27%	25.91%	13.48%	0.09%	20.78%	22.68%	21.08%	10.06%	16.96%	9.01%	12.35%	11.48%
FDSSX Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund	4.18%	4.79%	4.83%	2.03%	0.36%	0.84%	5.22%	6.09%	4.46%	3.07%	1.04%	5.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DTLGX and FDSSX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, DTLGX and FDSSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DTLGX or FDSSX?

DTLGX has higher volatility (6.17%) compared to FDSSX (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTLGX dropped -56.57% vs FDSSX's -56.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.