DTLE.L vs. BLTD
DTLE.L (iShares $ Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist) and BLTD (Bluemonte Long Term Bond ETF) are both Long-Term Bond funds. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DTLE.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for BLTD.
Performance
DTLE.L vs. BLTD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DTLE.L is traded in EUR, while BLTD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BLTD values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DTLE.L achieves a -1.71% return, which is significantly lower than BLTD's 1.64% return.
DTLE.L
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- -1.71%
- 6M
- -1.87%
- 1Y
- 1.77%
- 3Y*
- -3.63%
- 5Y*
- -8.07%
- 10Y*
- —
BLTD
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 1.33%
- YTD
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 0.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DTLE.L vs. BLTD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DTLE.L iShares $ Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist | -1.71% | 2.56% |
BLTD Bluemonte Long Term Bond ETF | 1.64% | 2.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between DTLE.L and BLTD is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DTLE.L vs. BLTD — Risk / Return Rank
DTLE.L
BLTD
DTLE.L vs. BLTD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (DTLE.L) and Bluemonte Long Term Bond ETF (BLTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DTLE.L | BLTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.21 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.52 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DTLE.L | BLTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.24 | 0.58 | -0.82 |
Drawdowns
DTLE.L vs. BLTD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DTLE.L drawdown since its inception was -52.29%, which is greater than BLTD's maximum drawdown of -5.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTLE.L and BLTD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DTLE.L | BLTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.29% | -5.33% | -46.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.88% | -1.89% | -45.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.92% | -1.84% | -24.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | — | — |
Volatility
DTLE.L vs. BLTD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DTLE.L | BLTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.46% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.73% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.91% | 7.48% | +2.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 7.48% | +7.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.50% | 7.48% | +8.02% |
DTLE.L vs. BLTD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DTLE.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than BLTD's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DTLE.L vs. BLTD - Dividend Comparison
DTLE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, more than BLTD's 3.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLTD Bluemonte Long Term Bond ETF | 3.92% | 2.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DTLE.L iShares $ Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist | 4.25% | 4.18% | 4.75% | 3.75% | 3.05% | 1.76% | 1.69% | 2.50% | 2.88% | 0.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DTLE.L and BLTD have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DTLE.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DTLE.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for BLTD.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Bluemonte. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for DTLE.L and 0.23% for BLTD.
Find the right allocation for DTLE.L and BLTD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer