PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DTLA.L vs. QDVE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DTLA.L vs. QDVE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DTLA.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DTLA.L is traded in USD, while QDVE.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the QDVE.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTLA.L achieves a -0.86% return, which is significantly lower than QDVE.DE's 17.00% return.


DTLA.L

1D
0.44%
1M
1.10%
YTD
-0.86%
6M
0.88%
1Y
4.30%
3Y*
-1.20%
5Y*
-6.37%
10Y*

QDVE.DE

1D
2.41%
1M
-0.93%
YTD
17.00%
6M
19.03%
1Y
43.65%
3Y*
31.42%
5Y*
22.64%
10Y*
26.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DTLA.L vs. QDVE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DTLA.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-0.86%4.49%-6.90%1.69%-30.29%-4.46%17.00%15.69%3.65%
QDVE.DE
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF
17.00%24.19%37.73%59.04%-29.90%35.16%42.34%50.64%-8.92%

Correlation

The correlation between DTLA.L and QDVE.DE is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2018

-0.08

The correlation between DTLA.L and QDVE.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.12 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DTLA.L vs. QDVE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTLA.L
DTLA.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
DTLA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTLA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTLA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
DTLA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTLA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVE.DE
QDVE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
QDVE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DTLA.L vs. QDVE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DTLA.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DTLA.LQDVE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.33

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.45

2.56

-2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.12

7.56

-6.44

DTLA.L vs. QDVE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTLA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the QDVE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTLA.L and QDVE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DTLA.L vs. QDVE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTLA.L drawdown since its inception was -48.41%, which is greater than QDVE.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTLA.L and QDVE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DTLA.LQDVE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.41%

-33.59%

-14.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.50%

-16.48%

+8.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.57%

-26.14%

+7.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.80%

-33.59%

-9.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.40%

-7.66%

-32.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.06%

-5.95%

-18.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

5.58%

-2.58%

Volatility

DTLA.L vs. QDVE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DTLA.L) is 3.33%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE) has a volatility of 8.28%. This indicates that DTLA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DTLA.LQDVE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

8.28%

-4.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.74%

16.00%

-9.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.03%

20.96%

-10.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.95%

23.50%

-8.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.79%

22.06%

-7.27%

DTLA.L vs. QDVE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTLA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVE.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DTLA.L vs. QDVE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither DTLA.L nor QDVE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DTLA.L and QDVE.DE have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DTLA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DTLA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QDVE.DE.

DTLA.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while QDVE.DE is Technology Equities. DTLA.L tracks ICE US Treasury 20+ Year Index, while QDVE.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for DTLA.L and 0.15% for QDVE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DTLA.L and QDVE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer