DTEC vs. ACES
DTEC (ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF) and ACES (ALPS Clean Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DTEC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Disruptive Technologies Index, while ACES is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Clean Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DTEC returned 1.86%/yr vs -8.73%/yr for ACES. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DTEC charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for ACES.
Performance
DTEC vs. ACES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DTEC achieves a 3.04% return, which is significantly lower than ACES's 28.72% return.
DTEC
- 1D
- -2.82%
- 1M
- 7.50%
- YTD
- 3.04%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- 5.25%
- 3Y*
- 9.62%
- 5Y*
- 1.86%
- 10Y*
- —
ACES
- 1D
- -2.84%
- 1M
- 17.92%
- YTD
- 28.72%
- 6M
- 27.36%
- 1Y
- 69.96%
- 3Y*
- -1.21%
- 5Y*
- -8.73%
- 10Y*
- —
DTEC vs. ACES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTEC ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF | 3.04% | 7.21% | 9.89% | 25.03% | -31.29% | 4.89% | 44.12% | 35.44% | -13.66% |
ACES ALPS Clean Energy ETF | 28.72% | 25.44% | -26.71% | -20.04% | -28.44% | -19.44% | 140.33% | 51.70% | -9.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between DTEC and ACES is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2018 | 0.71 |
The correlation between DTEC and ACES shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DTEC vs. ACES - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DTEC
ACES
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
DTEC
ACES
Industrials
DTEC
ACES
Healthcare
DTEC
ACES
-
Financial Services
DTEC
ACES
Energy
DTEC
ACES
Utilities
DTEC
ACES
Communication Services
DTEC
ACES
-
Real Estate
DTEC
ACES
-
Consumer Cyclical
DTEC
ACES
Basic Materials
DTEC
-
ACES
Consumer Defensive
DTEC
-
ACES
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DTEC vs. ACES — Risk / Return Rank
DTEC
ACES
DTEC vs. ACES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC) and ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DTEC | ACES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.29 | 2.18 | -1.89 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.52 | 2.77 | -2.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.33 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | 4.03 | -3.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.60 | 10.16 | -9.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DTEC | ACES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 | 2.18 | -1.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | -0.24 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.22 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
DTEC vs. ACES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DTEC drawdown since its inception was -42.00%, smaller than the maximum ACES drawdown of -79.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTEC and ACES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DTEC | ACES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.00% | -79.05% | +37.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.31% | -17.44% | -2.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.47% | -58.68% | +37.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.00% | -74.44% | +32.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.09% | -56.41% | +51.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.31% | -38.87% | +25.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.71% | 6.91% | +1.80% |
Volatility
DTEC vs. ACES - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC) is 6.58%, while ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) has a volatility of 9.99%. This indicates that DTEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DTEC | ACES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.58% | 9.99% | -3.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.30% | 22.55% | -8.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.33% | 32.42% | -14.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.07% | 36.17% | -14.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.89% | 35.59% | -12.70% |
DTEC vs. ACES - Expense Ratio Comparison
DTEC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ACES's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
DTEC vs. ACES - Dividend Comparison
DTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than ACES's 0.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACES ALPS Clean Energy ETF | 0.54% | 0.70% | 1.10% | 1.44% | 1.08% | 0.71% | 0.56% | 1.79% | 0.34% |
DTEC ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.45% | 0.27% | 0.02% | 0.26% | 0.37% | 0.43% | 0.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DTEC and ACES have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACES has higher volatility (9.99%) compared to DTEC (6.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTEC dropped -42.00% vs ACES's -79.05%.
On 5-year performance, DTEC leads with 1.86% vs -8.73% for ACES. On fees, DTEC is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DTEC has been the lower-risk option at 6.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DTEC has performed better with a 1.86% return vs -8.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DTEC is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ACES.
ACES has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.04% for DTEC.
DTEC is categorized as Technology Equities, while ACES is Alternative Energy Equities. DTEC tracks Indxx Disruptive Technologies Index, while ACES tracks CIBC Atlas Clean Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DTEC and 0.55% for ACES.
ACES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DTEC and ACES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer