PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DTD vs. NTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DTD vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund (DTD) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTD achieves a 15.50% return, which is significantly higher than NTSX's 10.72% return.


DTD

1D
1.08%
1M
3.44%
6M
10.65%
YTD
15.50%
1Y
22.65%
3Y*
18.01%
5Y*
12.48%
10Y*
12.21%
ALL TIME*
9.85%

NTSX

1D
1.58%
1M
2.67%
6M
10.23%
YTD
10.72%
1Y
19.33%
3Y*
19.16%
5Y*
8.72%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.64M$1.91M$1.81M
$2.09M$1.82M$2.62M

DTD vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DTD
WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund
15.50%14.25%18.56%10.63%-3.83%26.26%2.45%28.19%-8.72%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
10.72%18.82%20.20%22.70%-25.84%22.21%24.87%32.03%-7.87%

Correlation

The correlation between DTD and NTSX is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2018

0.80

The correlation between DTD and NTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DTD vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DTD
DTD Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTD Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTD Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DTD vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund (DTD) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DTDNTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.26

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.61

2.12

+1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.06

8.59

+6.47

DTD vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTD Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTD and NTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DTD vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTD drawdown since its inception was -58.19%, which is greater than NTSX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTD and NTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DTDNTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.19%

-31.34%

-26.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.30%

-9.16%

+2.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.41%

-16.82%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.14%

-31.34%

+15.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.28%

-6.69%

-0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.51%

2.26%

-0.75%

Volatility

DTD vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund (DTD) is 2.69%, while WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that DTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DTDNTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

4.31%

-1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.08%

10.94%

-3.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.33%

13.41%

-4.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.53%

17.23%

-3.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.17%

18.23%

-2.06%

DTD vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTD has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

DTD vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

DTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, more than NTSX's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DTD
WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund
1.79%1.99%2.07%2.43%2.62%2.04%2.73%2.50%2.93%2.36%2.66%2.81%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.07%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DTD and NTSX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTSX has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to DTD (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTD dropped -58.19% vs NTSX's -31.34%.

On 5-year performance, DTD leads with 12.48% vs 8.72% for NTSX. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DTD has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DTD has performed better with a 12.48% return vs 8.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DTD.

DTD has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 1.07% for NTSX.

DTD is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while NTSX is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DTD and 0.20% for NTSX.

DTD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DTD and NTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer